updated attribution for one article

[unhappybirthday] / index.html

diff --git a/index.html b/index.html
index 31a6070b41bea7241705a67703c7d7c7acda2da7..75b29280ff6627c7873666fbbc246a08749fe637 100644 (file)
--- a/index.html
+++ b/index.html
@@ -74,8 +74,8 @@ copyright status, check out these resources:</p>
 <li><a href="http://www.snopes.com/music/songs/birthday.htm">Snopes'
 article on the legal status of <cite>Happy Birthday</cite></a></li>
 
-<li><a href="http://www.boycott-riaa.com/article/15999">Boycott-RIAA's
-article on <cite>Happy Birthday</cite> and copyright</a></li>
+<li><a href="http://www.boycott-riaa.com/article/15999">Great
+article on <cite>Happy Birthday</cite> and copyright by Kembrew McLeod</a></li>
 
 <li><a
 href="http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2003/7/5/112441/6280">Kuro5hin's
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ New York, NY 10019-8016<br/></p>
 
 </blockquote>
 
-<p>If you're going send a message, here's a sample letter.  (Before
+<p>If you're going to send a message, here's a sample letter.  (Before
 sending such a letter, you should know that some restaurants,
 nightclubs, etc., pay for blanket ASCAP catalogue licenses that might
 exempt patrons from copyright liability for singing during dinner.)
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ infringement:</p>
 <blockquote>
 <pre>Dear ASCAP,
 
-The copyright status of "Happy Birthday To You" and and the law
+The copyright status of "Happy Birthday To You" and the law
 related to public performances of copyrighted works have recently been
 brought to my attention. I am very concerned by the public's apparent
 disregard for copyright law demonstrated by rampant infringement of