...or among a substantial number of people who are not family or friends<br />
You are involved in a public performance of that work?</p>
-<p>Did you know an unauthorized public performance is a form of
+<p>Did you know an unauthorized public performance is often a form of
<em>copyright infringement</em>?</p>
</div>
<li><a href="http://www.snopes.com/music/songs/birthday.htm">Snopes'
article on the legal status of <cite>Happy Birthday</cite></a></li>
-<li><a href="http://www.boycott-riaa.com/article/15999">Boycott-RIAA's
-article on <cite>Happy Birthday</cite> and copyright</a></li>
+<li><a href="http://www.boycott-riaa.com/article/15999">Great
+article on <cite>Happy Birthday</cite> and copyright by Kembrew McLeod</a></li>
<li><a
href="http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2003/7/5/112441/6280">Kuro5hin's
</ul>
+<p><strong>Update:</strong> <a
+href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1111624">This
+article</a> by law professor Robert Brauneis has raised some important
+questions about the history of Happy Birthday. That said, copyright in
+the song continues to be enforced and Warner Brothers continues to
+collect more than $2 million each year in royalities. Until we hear a
+judge rule on Brauneis's suggestions, we'll continue to give Warner and
+the market the benefit of the doubt.</p>
+
+
<h2>Is Singing <cite>Happy Birthday</cite> in Public Really Copyright
Infringement?</h2>
substantial number of persons outside of a normal circle of a family
and its social acquaintances is gathered."</p>
-<p>This means that if you sing <cite>Happy Birthday</cite> to your family at
-home, you're probably not committing copyright infringment. However, if you
-do it in an restaurant — and if the restaurant hasn't already worked
-out a deal with ASCAP — you may be engaging in <em>copyright
-infringement</em>.</p>
+<p>Additionally, United States Code Title 17, ยง110(4) states that
+singing the song among a group of people "without any direct or indirect
+commercial advantage" will not constitute infringement either. But keep
+in mind: "indirect commercial advantage" is very broad. Courts have
+found that restaurants, camps, and other venues benefit indirectly from
+performances of songs like Happy Birthday. Unless the song has been
+licensed in these situations, it's infringement.</p>
+
+
+<p>This means that if you sing <cite>Happy Birthday</cite> to your
+family at home, you're probably not committing copyright infringment.
+However, if you do it in an restaurant — and if the restaurant
+hasn't already worked out a deal with ASCAP — you may be engaging
+in <em>copyright infringement</em>.</p>
<h2>How Can I Help Stop Infringement?</h2>
<blockquote>
<pre>Dear ASCAP,
-The copyright status of "Happy Birthday To You" and and the law
+The copyright status of "Happy Birthday To You" and the law
related to public performances of copyrighted works have recently been
brought to my attention. I am very concerned by the public's apparent
disregard for copyright law demonstrated by rampant infringement of
href="http://www.cafepress.com/unhappybirthday">official Unhappy
Birthday store</a>.</p>
-<p>You can get in contact with our leadership by emailing our
-copyrighteous spokesman — Benjamin Mako Hill — at <a
-href="mailto:mako@atdot.cc">mako@atdot.cc</a> </p>
+<p>Our president is Raymond Ty. You can get in contact with our
+leadership by emailing our copyrighteous spokesman — Benjamin Mako
+Hill — at <a href="mailto:mako@atdot.cc">mako@atdot.cc</a> </p>
</div>