diff, patch, CVS and Subversion which are not optimized for this
task. The worse (and much more common) situation occurs when two
groups go about their work ignorant or partially ignorant of the
- code bieng cut on the other side of the fork. Important features
+ code being cut on the other side of the fork. Important features
and fixes are implemented twice — differently and
incompatibly.</para>
<para>That said, the importance of the goals described by
Remnant in the context of of the Ubuntu development model
- cannot be overstated. Ever line of delta between Debian and
+ cannot be overstated. Every line of delta between Debian and
Ubuntu has a cost for Ubuntu developers. Technology, social
practices, and wise choices may reduce that cost but it cannot
eliminate it. The resources that Ubuntu can bring to bear upon
moment, an incomplete list of free software VCS tools includes
GNU Arch, Bazaar, Bazaar-NG, Darcs, Monotone, SVK (based on
Subversion), GIT (a system developed by Linus Torvalds as a
- temporary replacement for BitKeeper) and others.</para>
+ replacement for BitKeeper) and others.</para>
<para>Each of these tools, at least after they reach a certain
level of maturity, allow or will allow users to develop
entire derivative distribution are more complicated than those
associated with working with a single "upstream" project,
distributed version control is only now being actively
- deployed in the Ubuntu project. In doing so, th project is
+ deployed in the Ubuntu project. In doing so, the project is
focusing on integrating these into problem specific tools
built on top of distributed version control.</para>