Added a few typo fixes and the linke from Sven Hoexter.

[to_fork_or_not] / to_fork_or_not_to_fork.xml

diff --git a/to_fork_or_not_to_fork.xml b/to_fork_or_not_to_fork.xml
index 1f72eccda5f99ef90c54e91f9f34838ee896bdd0..d624cac11ba5b90d5ccb54531cb5144a64ce2807 100644 (file)
--- a/to_fork_or_not_to_fork.xml
+++ b/to_fork_or_not_to_fork.xml
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@
       diff, patch, CVS and Subversion which are not optimized for this
       task. The worse (and much more common) situation occurs when two
       groups go about their work ignorant or partially ignorant of the
-      code bieng cut on the other side of the fork. Important features
+      code being cut on the other side of the fork. Important features
       and fixes are implemented twice — differently and
       incompatibly.</para>
 
@@ -391,7 +391,7 @@
        most intrusive kind &mdash; changes to the code itself.</para>
 
       <para>That said, the Ubuntu project is explicit about the fact
-       that it could not exist with the work done by the Debian
+       that it could not exist without the work done by the Debian
        project.<footnote>
          <para>You can see that explicit statement on Ubuntu's
            website here: <ulink
@@ -472,7 +472,7 @@
 
       <para>That said, the importance of the goals described by
        Remnant in the context of of the Ubuntu development model
-       cannot be overstated. Ever line of delta between Debian and
+       cannot be overstated. Every line of delta between Debian and
        Ubuntu has a cost for Ubuntu developers. Technology, social
        practices, and wise choices may reduce that cost but it cannot
        eliminate it. The resources that Ubuntu can bring to bear upon
@@ -721,7 +721,7 @@
        moment, an incomplete list of free software VCS tools includes
        GNU Arch, Bazaar, Bazaar-NG, Darcs, Monotone, SVK (based on
        Subversion), GIT (a system developed by Linus Torvalds as a
-       temporary replacement for BitKeeper) and others.</para>
+        replacement for BitKeeper) and others.</para>
 
       <para>Each of these tools, at least after they reach a certain
        level of maturity, allow or will allow users to develop
@@ -756,7 +756,7 @@
        entire derivative distribution are more complicated than those
        associated with working with a single "upstream" project,
        distributed version control is only now being actively
-       deployed in the Ubuntu project. In doing so, th project is
+       deployed in the Ubuntu project. In doing so, the project is
        focusing on integrating these into problem specific tools
        built on top of distributed version control.</para>