- site. Linux accomplishes this by having all the v2.2 and a v2.3
- subdirectory where it is immediately obvious (after you know
- their version numbering scheme) which directory is the most
- recent stable and the current development releases. Debian
- accomplishes this by naming all their distribution by name and
- then changing symlinks named <quote>stable,</quote>
- <quote>unstable</quote> and <quote>frozen</quote> to point to
- which ever distribution (by name) is in whatever stage. Both
- methods work and their are others. In any case, it is important
- that different branches are always available, are accessible
- from consistent locations, and that different branches are
- clearly distinguished from each other so your users know
- exactly what they want to be downloading and where to get
- it.</para>
+ site. Linux accomplishes this by having kernels in a v2.2 and a
+ v2.3 subdirectory where it is immediately obvious (after you
+ know their version numbering scheme) which directory is for the
+ most recent stable and the current development releases. Debian
+ accomplishes this by naming all their distribution with names
+ (i.e. woody, potato, etc.) and then changing symlinks named
+ <quote>stable,</quote> <quote>unstable</quote> and
+ <quote>frozen</quote> to point to which ever distribution (by
+ name) is in whatever stage. Both methods work and there are
+ others. In any case, it is important that different branches
+ are always available, are accessible from consistent locations,
+ and that different branches are clearly distinguished from each
+ other so your users know exactly what they want to be
+ downloading and where to get it.</para>