+ <para>
+ The answers to these questions are never straightforward and its
+ very possible (and even likely) that the person who submitted the
+ patch may feel differently about the answer to these questions
+ than you do. However, if you feel that that the answer to either
+ of those questions is <quote>no,</quote> it is your responsibility
+ to reject the change. If you fail to do this, the project will
+ become unwieldy and unmaintainable and many ultimately fail.
+ </para>
+ </sect3>
+
+ <sect3>
+ <title>Rejecting patches</title>
+
+ <para>
+ Rejecting patches is probably the most difficult and sensitive
+ job that the maintainer of any free software project has to
+ face. But sometimes it has to be done. I mentioned earlier (in
+ <xref linkend="developers"> and in <xref linkend="delegation">)
+ that you need to try and balance your responsibility and power to
+ make what you think are the best technical decisions with the
+ fact that you will lose support from other developers if you seem
+ like you are on a power trip or being overly bossy or possessive
+ of the community's project. I recommend that you keep these three
+ major concepts in mind when rejecting patches (or other changes):
+ </para>
+
+ <sect4>
+ <title>Bring it to the community</title>
+ <para>
+ One of the best ways of justifying a decision to reject a patch
+ and working to not seem like you keep an iron grip on your
+ project is by not making the decision alone at all. It might
+ make sense to turn over larger proposed changes or more
+ difficult decisions to a development mailing list where they can
+ be discussed and debated. There will be some patches (bug fixes,
+ etc.) which will definitely be accepted and some that you feel
+ are so offbase that they do not even merit further
+ discussion. It is those that fall into the grey area between
+ these two groups that might merit a quick forward to a mailing
+ list.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ I recommend this process wholeheartedly. As the project
+ maintainer you are worried about making the best decision for
+ the project, for the project's users and developers, and for
+ yourself as a responsible project leader. Turning things over to
+ an email list will demonstrate your own responsibility and
+ responsive leadership as it tests and serves the interests of
+ your software's community.
+ </para>
+ </sect4>
+
+ <sect4>
+ <title>Technical issues are not always good justification</title>
+ <para>
+ Especially towards the beginning of your project's life, you
+ will find that many changes are difficult to implement,
+ introduce new bugs, or have other technical problems. Try to see
+ past these. Especially with added functionality, good ideas do
+ not always come from good programmers. Technical merit is a
+ valid reason to postpone an application of a patch but it is not
+ always a good reason to reject a change outright. Even small
+ changes are worth the effort of working with the developer
+ submitting the patch to iron out bugs and incorporate the change
+ if you think it seems like a good addition to your project. The
+ effort on your part will work to make your project a community
+ project and it will pull a new or less experienced developer
+ into your project and even teach them something that might help
+ them in making their next patch.
+ </para>
+ </sect4>
+
+ <sect4>
+ <title>Common courtesy</title>
+ <para>
+ It should go without saying but, <emphasis>above all and in all
+ cases, just be nice.</emphasis> If someone has an idea and cares
+ about it enough to write some code and submit a patch, they
+ care, they are motivated, and they are already involved. Your
+ goal as the maintainer is make sure they submit again. They may
+ have thrown you a dud this time but next time may be the idea or
+ feature that revolutionizes your project.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ It is your responsibility to first justify your choice to not
+ incorporate their change clearly and concisely. Then thank
+ them. Let them know that you a appreciate their help and feel
+ horrible that you can't incorporate their change. Let them know
+ that you look forward to their staying involved and you hope
+ that the next patch or idea meshes better with your project
+ because you appreciate their work and want to see it in your
+ application. If you have ever had a patch rejected after putting
+ a large deal of time, thought, and energy into it, you remember
+ how it feels and it feels bad. Keep this in mind when you have
+ to let someone down. It's never easy but you need to do
+ everything you can to make it as not-unpleasant as possible.
+ </para>
+ </sect4>
+ </sect3>
+ </sect2>
+
+<!-- Section2: branches -->
+
+ <sect2 id="branches">
+ <title>Stable and Development Branches</title>
+
+ <para>
+ The idea of stable and development branches has already been
+ described briefly in <xref linkend="chooseversioning"> and in
+ <xref linkend="delegatebranch">. These allusions attest to some of
+ the ways that multiple branches can affect your software. Branches
+ can let you avoid (to some extent) some of the problems around
+ rejecting patches (as described in <xref linkend="patching">) by
+ allowing you to temporarily compromise the stability of your
+ project without affecting those users who need that stability.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ The most common way of branching your project is to have one
+ branch that is stable and one that is for development. This is the
+ model followed by the Linux kernel that is described in <xref
+ linkend="chooseversioning">. In this model, there is
+ <emphasis>always</emphasis> one branch that is stable and always
+ one that is in development. Before any new release, the
+ development branch goes into a <quote>feature freeze</quote> as
+ described in <xref linkend="freezing"> where major changes and
+ added features are rejected or put on hold under the development
+ kernel is released as the new stable branch and major development
+ resumes on the development branch. Bug fixes and small changes
+ that are unlikely to have any large negative repercussions are
+ incorporated into the stable branch as well as the development
+ branch.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ Linux's model provides an extreme example. On many projects, there is no
+ need to have two versions constantly available. It may make sense to
+ have two versions only near a release. The Debian project has
+ historically made both a stable and an unstable distribution
+ available but has expanded to this to include: stable, unstable,
+ testing, experimental, and (around release time) a frozen
+ distribution that only incorporates bug fixes during the
+ transition from unstable to stable. There are few projects whose
+ size would necessitate a system like Debian's but this use of
+ branches helps demonstrate how they can be used to balance
+ consistent and effective development with the need to make regular
+ and usable releases.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ In trying to set up a development tree for yourself, there are
+ several things that might be useful to keep in mind:
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ <variablelist>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term>Minimize the number of branches</term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>Debian may be able to make good use of four or five
+ branches but it contains gigabytes of software in over 5000
+ packages compiled for 5-6 different architectures. For you,
+ two is probably a good ceiling. Too many branches will confuse
+ your users (I can't count how many times I had to describe
+ Debian's system when it only had 2 and sometimes 3 branches!),
+ potential developers and even yourself. Branches can help but
+ they come at a cost so use them very sparingly.</para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term>Make sure that all your different branches are explained</term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>As I mentioned in the preceding paragraph, different
+ branches <emphasis>will</emphasis> confuse your users. Do
+ everything you can to avoid this by clearly explaining the
+ different branches in a prominent page on your website and in a
+ README file in the <acronym>FTP</acronym> or
+ web directory.</para>
+
+ <para>
+ I might also recommend against a mistake that I think Debian
+ has made. The terms <quote>unstable,</quote>
+ <quote>testing,</quote> and <quote>experimental</quote> are
+ vague and difficult to rank in order of stability (or
+ instability as the case may be). Try explaining to someone
+ that <quote>stable</quote> actually means <quote>ultra
+ stable</quote> and that <quote>unstable</quote> doesn't
+ actually include any unstable software but is really stable
+ software that is untested as a distribution.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ If you are going to use branches, especially early on, keep in
+ mind that people are conditioned to understand the terms
+ <quote>stable</quote> and <quote>development</quote> and you
+ probably can't go wrong with this simple and common division of
+ branches.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term>Make sure all your branches are always available</term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>Like a lot of this document, this should probably should
+ go without saying but experience has taught me that it's not
+ always obvious to people. It's a good idea to physically split
+ up different branches into different directories or directory
+ trees on your <acronym>FTP</acronym> or web site. Linux
+ accomplishes this by having kernels in a v2.2 and a v2.3
+ subdirectory where it is immediately obvious (after you know
+ their version numbering scheme) which directory is for the most
+ recent stable and the current development releases. Debian
+ accomplishes this by naming all their distribution with names
+ (i.e. woody, potato, etc.) and then changing symlinks named
+ <quote>stable,</quote> <quote>unstable</quote> and
+ <quote>frozen</quote> to point to which ever distribution (by
+ name) is in whatever stage. Both methods work and there are
+ others. In any case, it is important that different branches
+ are always available, are accessible from consistent locations,
+ and that different branches are clearly distinguished from each
+ other so your users know exactly what they want and where to
+ get it.</para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ </variablelist>
+ </para>
+
+ </sect2>
+
+<!-- Section2: otherdev -->
+
+ <sect2 id="otherdev">
+ <title>Other Project Management issues</title>
+ <para>
+ There are more issues surrounding interaction with developers in a
+ free software project that I can not touch on in great detail in a
+ HOWTO of this size and scope. Please don't hesitate to contact me if you see
+ any major omissions.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ Other smaller issues that are worth mentioning are:
+ </para>
+
+ <sect3 id="freezing">
+ <title>Freezing</title>
+ <para>
+ For those projects that choose to adopt a split development model
+ (<xref linkend="branches">), freezing is a concept that is worth
+ becoming familiar with.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ Freezes come in two major forms. A <quote>feature freeze</quote>
+ is a period when no significant functionality is added to a
+ program. It is a period where established functionality (even
+ skeletons of barely working functionality) can be improved and
+ perfected. It is a period where bugs are fixed. This type of
+ freeze is usually applied some period (a month or two) before a
+ release. It is easy to push a release back as you wait for
+ <quote>one more feature</quote> and a freeze helps to avoid this
+ situation by drawing the much needed line in the sand. It gives
+ developers room they need to get a program ready for release.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ The second type of freeze is a <quote>code freeze</quote> which
+ is much more like a released piece of software. Once a piece of
+ software has entered a <quote>code freeze,</quote> all changes to
+ the code are discouraged and only changes that fix known bugs
+ are permitted. This type of freeze usually follows a
+ <quote>feature freeze</quote> and directly precedes a
+ release. Most released software is in what could be interpreted
+ as a sort of high level <quote>code freeze.</quote>
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ Even if you never choose to appoint a release manager (<xref
+ linkend="releasemanager">), you will have an easier time
+ justifying the rejection or postponement of patches (<xref
+ linkend="patching">) before a release with a publicly stated
+ freeze in effect.
+ </para>
+ </sect3>
+ </sect2>
+
+ <sect2>
+ <title>Forks</title>
+ <para>
+ I wasn't sure about how I would deal with forking in this
+ document (or if I would deal with forking at all). A fork is when
+ a group of developers takes code from a free software project and
+ actually starts a brand new free software project with it. The
+ most famous example of a fork was between Emacs and XEmacs. Both
+ emacsen are based on an identical code-base but for technical,
+ political, and philosophical reasons, development was split into
+ two projects which now compete with each other.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ The short version of the fork section is, <emphasis>don't do
+ them.</emphasis> Forks force developers to choose one project to
+ work with, cause nasty political divisions, and redundancy of
+ work. Luckily, usually the threat of the fork is enough to scare
+ the maintainer or maintainers of a project into changing the way
+ they run their project.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ In his chapter on <quote>The Open Source Process,</quote> Karl
+ Fogel describes how to do a fork if you absolutely must. If you
+ have determined that is absolutely necessary and that the
+ differences between you and the people threatening to fork are
+ absolutely unresolvable, I recommend Fogel's book as a good place
+ to start.
+ </para>
+ </sect2>
+ </sect1>
+
+<!-- Section1: users -->
+
+ <sect1 id="users">
+ <title>Maintaining a Project: Interacting with Users</title>
+ <indexterm>
+ <primary>fswd!users</primary>
+ </indexterm>
+
+ <para>
+ If you've worked your way up to here, congratulations, you are
+ nearing the end of this document. This final section describes some
+ of the situations in which you, in your capacity as project
+ maintainer, will be interacting with users. It gives some
+ suggestions on how these situations might be handled effectively.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ Interacting with users is difficult. In our discussion of
+ interaction with developers, the underlying assumption is that in a
+ free software project, a project maintainer must constantly strive to
+ attract and keep developers who can easily leave at any time.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ Users in the free software community are different than developers
+ and are also different than users in the world of proprietary
+ software and they should be treated differently than either
+ group. Some ways in which the groups differ significantly follow:
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ <itemizedlist>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <para>The lines between users and developers are blurred in ways
+ that is totally foreign to any proprietary development
+ model. Your users are often your developers and vice
+ versa.</para>
+ </listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <para>In the free software world, you are often your users' only
+ choice. Because there is such an emphasis on not replicating the
+ work of others in the free software community and because the
+ element of competition present in the propriety software model is
+ absent (or at least in an extremely different form) in the free
+ software development model, you will probably be the only project
+ that does what you do (or at least the only one that does what
+ you do in the way that you do it). This means your responsiveness
+ to your users is even more important than in the proprietary
+ software world.</para>
+ </listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <para>In an almost paradoxical situation, free software projects
+ have less immediate or dire consequences for ignoring their users
+ altogether. It is also often easier to do. Because you don't
+ usually need to compete with another product, chances are good
+ that you will not be scrambling to gain the features of your
+ competitor's newest program. This means that your development
+ process will have to be directed either internally, by a
+ commitment to your users, or through both.</para>
+ </listitem>
+ </itemizedlist>
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ Trying to tackle this unique situation can only be done
+ indirectly. Developers and maintainers need to listen to users and
+ to try and be as responsive as possible. A solid knowledge of the
+ situation recounted above is any free software developer's best tool
+ for shifting his development or leadership style to fit the unique
+ process of free software project management. This chapters will try and
+ introduce some of the more difficult or important points in any
+ projects interactions with users and give some hints on how to
+ tackle these.
+ </para>
+
+<!-- Section2: testing -->
+
+ <sect2 id="testing">
+ <title>Testing and Testers</title>
+
+ <para>
+ In addition to your users being your developers, they are also
+ (and perhaps more commonly) your testers. Before I get flamed, I
+ should rephrase my sentence: <emphasis>some of your
+ users</emphasis> (those who explicityly volunteer) are your
+ testers.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ It is important that this distinction be made early on because not
+ all of your users want to be testers. Many users want to use
+ stable software and don't care if they don't have the newest,
+ greatest software with the latest, greatest features. These users
+ except a stable, tested piece of software without major or obvious
+ bugs and will be angry if they find themselves testing. This is
+ yet another way in which a split development model (as mentioned
+ in <xref linkend="branches">) might come in handy.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ <quote><ulink
+ url="http://news.linuxprogramming.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2000-10-31-001-05-CD">Managing
+ Projects the Open Source Way</ulink></quote> describes what a
+ good test should look for:
+ </para>
+
+ <variablelist>
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term>Boundary conditions</term>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <para>Maximum buffer lengths, data conversions, upper/lower
+ boundary limits, and so on.</para>
+ </listitem>
+
+ </varlistentry>
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term>Inappropriate behavior</term>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <para>Its a good idea to find out what a program will do if a
+ user hands it a value it isn't expecting, hits the wrong button,
+ etc. Ask yourself a bunch of <quote>what if</quote> questions
+ and think of anything that <emphasis>might</emphasis> fail or
+ <emphasis>might</emphasis> go wrong and find out what your
+ program would do in those cases.</para>
+ </listitem>
+
+ </varlistentry>
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term>Graceful failure</term>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <para>The answer to a number of the <quote>what if</quote>
+ questions above is probably <quote>failure</quote> which is
+ often the only answer. Now make sure that it happens
+ nicely. Make sure that when it crashes, there is some indication
+ of why it crashed or failed so that the user or developer
+ understands whats going on.</para>
+ </listitem>
+
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term>Standards conformance</term>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <para>If possible, make sure your programs conforms to
+ standards. If it's interactive, don't be too creative with
+ interfaces. If it is non-interactive, make sure it communicates
+ over appropriate and established channels with other programs
+ and with the rest of the system.</para>
+ </listitem>
+
+ </varlistentry>
+ </variablelist>
+
+ <sect3>
+ <title>Automated testing</title>
+ <para>
+ For many programs, many common mistakes can be caught by
+ automated means. Automated tests tend to be pretty good at
+ catching errors that you've run into several times before or
+ the things you just forget. They are not very good at finding
+ errors, even major ones, that are totally unforeseen.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ CVS comes with a bourne shell script called sanity.sh that is
+ worth looking at. Debian uses a program called lintian that
+ checks Debian packages for all of the most common errors. While
+ use of these scripts may not be helpful, there is a host of other
+ sanity checking software on the net that may be applicable (feel
+ free to email me any recommendations). None of these will create
+ a bug-free release but they will avoid at least some major
+ oversights. Finally, if your programs become a long term
+ endeavor, you will find that there are certain errors that you
+ tend to make over and over. Start a collection of scripts that
+ check for these errors to help keep them out of future releases.
+ </para>
+ </sect3>
+
+ <sect3>
+ <title>Testing by testers</title>
+ <para>
+ For any program that depends on user interactivity, many bugs
+ will only be uncovered through testing by users actually clicking
+ the keys and pressing the mouse buttons. For this you need
+ testers and as many as possible.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ The most difficult part of testing is finding testers. It's
+ usually a good tactic to post a message to a relevant mailing
+ list or news group announcing a specific proposed release date
+ and outlining the functionality of your program. If you put some
+ time into the announcement, you are sure to get a few responses.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ The second most difficult part of testing is
+ <emphasis>keeping</emphasis> your testers and keeping them
+ actively involved in the testing process. Fortunately, there are
+ some tried and true tactics that can applied towards this end:
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ <variablelist>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term>Make things simple for your testers</term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>Your testers are doing you a favor so make it as easy as
+ possible for them. This means that you should be careful to
+ package your software in a way that is easy to find, unpack,
+ install, and uninstall. This also means you should explain
+ what you are looking for to each tester and make the means for
+ reporting bugs simple and well established. The key is to
+ provide as much structure as possible to make your testers'
+ jobs easy and to maintain as much flexibility as possible for
+ those that want to do things a little differently.</para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term>Be responsive to your testers</term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>When your testers submit bugs, respond to them and
+ respond quickly. Even if you are only responding to tell them
+ that the bug has already been fixed, quick and consistent
+ responses make them feel like their work is heard, important,
+ and appreciated.</para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term>Thank your testers</term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>Thank them personally each time they send you
+ patch. Thank them publicly in the documentation and the about
+ section of your program. You appreciate your testers and your
+ program would not be possible without their help. Make sure
+ they know it. Publicly, pat them on the back to make sure the rest of
+ the world knows it too. It will be appreciated more than you
+ expected.</para>
+ </listitem>
+
+ </varlistentry>
+ </variablelist>
+ </para>
+
+ </sect3>
+ </sect2>
+
+<!-- Section2: support -->
+
+ <sect2 id="support">
+ <title>Setting up Support Infrastructure</title>
+
+ <para>
+ While testing is important, the large part of your interactions
+ and responsibility to your users falls under the category of
+ support. The best way to make sure your users are adequately
+ supported in using your program is to set up a good infrastructure
+ for this purpose so that your developers and users help each other
+ and less of the burden falls on you. This way, people will also
+ get quicker and better responses to their questions. This
+ infrastructure comes in several major forms:
+ </para>
+
+ <sect3>
+ <title>Documentation</title>
+ <para>
+ It should not come as any surprise that the key element to any
+ support infrastructure is good documentation. This topic was
+ large covered in <xref linkend="documentation"> and will not be
+ repeated here.
+ </para>
+ </sect3>
+
+ <sect3>
+ <title>Mailing lists</title>
+ <para>
+ Aside from documentation, effective mailing lists will be your
+ greatest tool in providing user support. Running a mailing list
+ well is more complicated than installing mailing list software
+ onto a machine.
+ </para>
+
+ <sect4>
+ <title>Separate lists</title>
+
+ <para>
+ A good idea is too separate your user and development mailing
+ lists (perhaps into project-user@host and project-devel@host)
+ and enforce the division. If people post a development question
+ onto -user, politely ask them to repost it onto -devel and vise
+ versa. Subscribe yourself to both groups and encourage all
+ primarily developers to do the same.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ This system provides so that no one person is stuck doing all of
+ the support work and works so that users learn more about the
+ program, they can help newer users with their questions.
+ </para>
+ </sect4>
+
+ <sect4>
+ <title>Choose mailing list software well</title>
+ <para>
+ Please don't make the selection of mailing list software
+ impulsively. Please consider easy accessibility by users without
+ a lot of technical experience so you want to be as easy as
+ possible. Web accessibility to an archive of the list is also
+ important.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ The two biggest free software mailing list programs are <ulink
+ url="http://www.greatcircle.com/majordomo/">majordomo</ulink>
+ and <ulink url="http://www.list.org/">GNU Mailman</ulink>. A
+ long time advocate of majordomo, I would now recommend any
+ project choose GNU Mailman. It fulfills the criteria listed
+ above and makes it easier. It provides a good mailing
+ list program for a free software project maintainer as opposed
+ to a good mailing list application for a mailing list
+ administrator.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ There are other things you want to take into consideration in
+ setting up your list. If it is possible to gate your mailing
+ lists to USENET and provide it in digest form as well as
+ making them accessible on the web, you will please some users
+ and work to make the support infrastructure slightly more
+ accessible.
+ </para>
+ </sect4>
+ </sect3>
+
+ <sect3>
+ <title>Other support ideas</title>
+
+ <para>
+ A mailing list and accessible documentation are far from all you
+ can do to set up good user support infrastructure. Be
+ creative. If you stumble across something that works well, email me
+ and I'll include it here.
+ </para>
+
+ <sect4>
+ <title>Make your self accessible</title>
+ <para>
+ You can not list too few methods to reach you. If you hang out
+ in an <acronym>IRC</acronym> channel, don't hesitate to list it
+ in your projects documentation. List email and snailmail
+ addresses, and ways to reach you via <acronym>ICQ</acronym>,
+ <acronym>AIM</acronym>, or Jabber if they apply.
+ </para>
+ </sect4>
+
+ <sect4>
+ <title>Bug management software</title>
+ <para>
+ For many large software projects, use of bug management software
+ is essential to keep track of which bugs have been fixed, which
+ bugs have not been fixed, and which bugs are being fixed by
+ which people. Debian uses the <ulink
+ url="http://bugs.debian.org">Debian Bug Tracking System</ulink>
+ (<acronym>BTS</acronym>) although it may not be best choice for
+ every project (it seems to currently be buckling under its own
+ weight) As well as a damn good web browser, the mozilla project
+ has spawned a sub-project resulting in a bug tracking system
+ called <ulink
+ url="http://www.mozilla.org/projects/bugzilla/">bugzilla</ulink>
+ which has become extremely possible and which I like a lot.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ These systems (and others like them) can be unwieldy so
+ developers should be careful to not spend more time on the bug
+ tracking system than on the bugs or the projects themselves. If
+ a project continues to grow, use of a bug tracking system can
+ provide an easy standard avenue for users and testers to report
+ bugs and for developers and maintainers to fix them and track
+ them in an orderly fashion.
+ </para>
+ </sect4>
+ </sect3>
+ </sect2>
+
+<!-- Section2: releasing -->
+
+ <sect2 id="releasing">
+ <title>Releasing Your Program</title>
+
+ <para>
+ As mentioned earlier in the HOWTO, the first rule of releasing is,
+ <emphasis>release something useful.</emphasis> Non-working or
+ not-useful software will not attract anyone to your
+ project. People will be turned off of your project and will be likely
+ to simply gloss over it next time they see a new version
+ announced. Half-working software, if useful, will intrigue people,
+ whet their appetites for versions to come, and encourage them to
+ join the development process.
+ </para>
+
+ <sect3>
+ <title>When to release</title>
+
+ <para>
+ Making the decision to release your software for the first time
+ is an incredibly important and incredibly stressful decision. But
+ it needs to done. My advice is to try and make something that
+ is complete enough to be usable and incomplete enough to allow
+ for flexibility and room for imagination by your future
+ developers. It's not an easy decision. Ask for help on a local
+ Linux User Group mailing list or from a group of developer
+ friends.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ One tactic is to first do an <quote>alpha</quote> or
+ <quote>beta</quote> release as described below in <xref
+ linkend="alphabeta">. However, most of the guidelines described
+ above still apply.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ <emphasis>When you feel in your gut that it is time and you feel
+ you've weighed the situation well several times, cross your
+ fingers and take the plunge.</emphasis>
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ After you've released for the first time, knowing when to release
+ becomes less stressful, but just as difficult to gauge. I like
+ the criteria offered by Robert Krawitz in his article, <ulink
+ url="http://www.advogato.org/article/196.html"><quote>Free
+ Software Project Management</quote></ulink> for maintaining a
+ good release cycle. He recommends that you ask yourself,
+ <quote>does this release...</quote>
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ <itemizedlist>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>Contain sufficient new functionality or bug fixes to be
+ worth the effort.</para>
+ </listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <para>Be spaced sufficiently far apart to allow the user time
+ to work with the latest release.</para>
+ </listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <para>Be sufficiently functional so that the user can get work
+ done (quality).</para>
+ </listitem>
+ </itemizedlist>
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ If the answer is yes to all of these questions, its probably time
+ for a release. If in doubt, remember that asking for advice can't
+ hurt.
+ </para>
+ </sect3>
+
+ <sect3>
+ <title>How to release</title>
+
+ <para>
+ If you've followed the guidelines described in this HOWTO up
+ until this point, the mechanics of doing a release are going to
+ be the easy part of releasing. If you have set up consistent
+ distribution locations and the other infrastructure described in
+ the preceding sections, releasing should be as simple as building
+ the package, checking it once over, and uploading it into the
+ appropriate place and then making your website reflect the
+ change.
+ </para>
+ </sect3>
+
+ <sect3 id="alphabeta">
+ <title>Alpha, beta, and development releases</title>
+
+ <para>
+ When contemplating releases, it worth considering the fact that
+ not every release needs to be a full numbered release. Software
+ users are accustomed to pre-releases but you must be careful to
+ label these releases accurately or they will cause more problems then
+ they are worth.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ The observation is often made that many free software developers
+ seem to be confused about the release cycle. <quote><ulink
+ url="http://news.linuxprogramming.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2000-10-31-001-05-CD">Managing
+ Projects the Open Source Way</ulink></quote> suggests that you memorize
+ the phrase, <quote>Alpha is not Beta. Beta is not Release</quote>
+ and I'd agree that tis is a probably a good idea.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ <variablelist>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term>alpha releases</term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>Alpha software is feature-complete but sometimes only
+ partially functional.</para>
+
+ <para>Alpha releases are expected to be unstable, perhaps a
+ little unsafe, but definitely usable. They
+ <emphasis>can</emphasis> have known bugs and kinks that have
+ yet to be worked out. Before releasing an alpha, be sure to
+ keep in mind that <emphasis>alpha releases are still
+ releases</emphasis> and people are not going to be expecting a
+ nightly build from the CVS source. An alpha should work and
+ have minimal testing and bug fixing already finished.</para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term>beta releases</term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>Beta software is feature-complete and functional, but is
+ in the testing cycle and still has a few bugs left to be
+ ironed out.</para>
+
+ <para>Beta releases are general expected to be usable and
+ slightly unstable, although definitely <emphasis>not
+ unsafe.</emphasis> Beta releases usually preclude a full
+ release by under a month. They can contain small known bugs
+ but no major ones. All major functionality should be fully
+ implemented although the exact mechanics can still be worked
+ out. Beta releases are great tool to whet the appetites of
+ potential users by giving them a very realistic view of where
+ your project is going to be in the very near future and can
+ help keep interest by giving people
+ <emphasis>something.</emphasis></para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term>development releases</term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para><quote>Development release</quote> is much a more vague
+ term than <quote>alpha</quote> or <quote>beta</quote>. I
+ usually choose to reserve the term for discussion of a
+ development branch although there are other ways to use the
+ term. So many in fact, that I feel the term has been
+ cheapened. The popular window manager <ulink
+ url="http://www.enlightenment.org">Enlightenment</ulink> has
+ released <emphasis>nothing but</emphasis> development
+ releases. Most often, the term is used to describe releases
+ that are not even alpha or beta and if I were to release a
+ pre-alpha version of a piece of software in order to keep
+ interest in my project alive, this is probably how I would
+ have to label it.</para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ </variablelist>
+
+ </para>
+ </sect3>
+ </sect2>
+
+<!-- Section2: announcing -->
+
+ <sect2 id="announcing">
+ <title>Announcing Your Project</title>
+
+ <para>
+ Well, you've done it. You've (at least for the purposes of this
+ HOWTO) designed, built, and released your free software
+ project. All that is left is for you to tell the world so they
+ know to come and try it out and hopefully jump on board with
+ development. If everything is in order as described above, this
+ will be a quick and painless process. A quick announcement is all
+ that it takes to put yourself on the free software community's
+ radar screen.
+ </para>
+
+ <sect3>
+ <title>Mailing lists and USENET</title>
+ <para>
+ Email is still the way that most people on the Internet get their
+ information. Its a good idea to send a message announcing your
+ program to any relevant mailing list you know of and any relevant
+ USENET discussion group. Karl Fogel recommends that use you
+ simple subject describing the fact that the message is an
+ announcement, the name of the program, the version, and a
+ half-line long description of its functionality. This way, any
+ interested user or developer will be immediately attracted to
+ your announcement. Fogel's example looks like:
+ </para>
+
+ <screen>Subject: ANN: aub 1.0, a program to assemble USENET binaries</screen>
+
+ <para>
+ The rest of the email should describe the programs functionality
+ quickly and concisely in no more than two paragraphs and should
+ provide links to the projects webpage and direct links to
+ downloads for those that want to try it right away.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ You should repeat this announcement process consistently in the
+ same locations for each subsequent release.
+ </para>
+ </sect3>
+
+ <sect3>
+ <title>freshmeat.net</title>
+ <para>
+ Mentioned earlier in <xref linkend="evalwhere">, in today's free
+ software community, announcements of your project on freshmeat
+ are almost more important than announcements on mailing lists.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ Visit the <ulink url="http://freshmeat.net">freshmeat.net
+ website</ulink> or their <ulink
+ url="http://freshmeat.net/add-project/">submit project
+ page</ulink> to post your project onto their site and into their
+ database. In addition to a large website, freshmeat provides a
+ daily newsletter that highlights all the days releases and
+ reaches a huge audience (I personally skim it every night for any
+ interesting new releases).
+ </para>
+ </sect3>
+ </sect2>
+</sect1>
+
+ <bibliography>
+
+ <bibliodiv>
+ <title>Printed Books</title>
+
+ <biblioentry>
+ <biblioset>
+ <author>
+ <surname>Fogel</surname>
+ <firstname>Karl</firstname>
+ </author>
+
+ <title>Open Source Development with CVS</title>
+
+ <publisher>
+ <publishername>Coriolois Open Press</publishername>
+ </publisher>
+ <pubdate>1999</pubdate>
+
+ <isbn>1-57610-490-7</isbn>
+
+ <abstract>
+ <para>
+ Fogel's <quote>guide to using CVS in the free software
+ world</quote> is much more than its subitle. In the publisher's
+ own words: <quote><emphasis>Open Source Development with
+ CVS</emphasis> is one of the first books available that teaches
+ you development and implementation of Open Source
+ software.</quote> It also includes the best reference and
+ tutorial to CVS I have ever seen. It is the book that was
+ <emphasis>so good</emphasis> that it prompted me to write this
+ HOWTO because I thought the role it tried to serve was so
+ important and useful. Please check it or buy it if you can and
+ are seriously interested in running a free software project.
+ </para>
+ </abstract>
+ </biblioset>
+ </biblioentry>
+
+ <biblioentry
+ <biblioset>
+ <author>
+ <surname>Lessig</surname>
+ <firstname>Lawrence</firstname>
+ </author>
+
+ <title>Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace</title>
+
+ <publisher>
+ <publishername>Basic Books</publishername>
+ </publisher>
+ <pubdate>2000</pubdate>
+
+ <isbn>0-465-03913-8</isbn>
+
+ <abstract>
+ <para>
+ While it only briefly talks about free software (and does it by
+ tiptoeing around the free software/open source issue with the
+ spineless use of the term <quote>open code</quote> that only a
+ laywer could coin), Lessig's book is brilliant. Written by a
+ lawyer, it talks about how regulation on the Internet is not
+ done with law, but with the code itself and how the nature of
+ the code will determine the nature of future freedoms. In
+ addition to being a quick and enjoyable read, it gives some
+ cool history and describes how we <emphasis>need</emphasis>
+ free software in a way more powerfully than anything I've read
+ outside of <ulink
+ url="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html">RMS's
+ <quote>Right to Read.</quote></ulink>
+ </para>
+ </abstract>
+ </biblioset>
+ </biblioentry>
+
+ <biblioentry>
+ <biblioset>
+ <author>
+ <surname>Raymond</surname>
+ <firstname>Eric</firstname>
+ </author>
+
+ <title>The Cathedral and the Bazaar</title>
+ <subtitle>Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary</subtitle>
+
+ <publisher>
+ <publishername>O'Reilly</publishername>
+ </publisher>
+ <pubdate>1999</pubdate>
+
+ <isbn>1-56592-724-9</isbn>
+ <abstract>
+ <para>
+ Although I have to honestly say that I am not the ESR fan that
+ I used to be, this book proved invaluable in getting me where I
+ am today. The essay that gives the book its title does a good
+ job of sketching the free software process and does an an
+ amazing job of making an argument for free software/open source
+ development as a road to better software. The rest of the book
+ has other of ESR's articles, which for the most part are posted
+ on his website. Still, it's nice thing to own in hard copy and
+ something that every free software/open source hacker should
+ read.
+ </para>
+ </abstract>
+ </biblioset>
+ </biblioentry>
+ </bibliodiv>
+
+ <bibliodiv>
+ <title>Web-Accessable Resources</title>
+
+ <para>
+ This is a list of the web resources pertaining to this HOWTO that
+ I've found most helpful in compiling this information. If you know
+ of others that would help, please don't hesitate to email me at
+ <email>mako@debian.org</email> and we can look into getting it
+ added to the list and represented in the HOWTO.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ I'd recommend that any free software developer (or potential one)
+ skim through these sites becaue they have each have a lot to say.
+ </para>
+
+ <biblioentry>
+ <biblioset>
+ <author>
+ <surname>Manley</surname>
+ <firstname>Montey</firstname>
+ </author>
+
+ <title><ulink
+ url="http://news.linuxprogramming.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2000-10-31-001-05-CD">Managing
+ Projects the Open Source Way</ulink></title>
+
+ <publisher>
+ <publishername><ulink
+ url="http://www.linuxprogramming.com">Linux
+ Programming</ulink></publishername>
+ </publisher>
+ <pubdate>Oct 31, 2000</pubdate>
+
+ <abstract>
+ <para>
+ In one of the better articles on the subject that I've read,
+ Monty sums up some of the major points I touch on including:
+ starting a project, testing, documenation, organizing a team and
+ leadership, and several other topics. While more opiniated that
+ I try to be, I think its an important article that I found very
+ helpful in writing this HOWTO. I've tried to cite him in
+ the places where I borrowed from him most.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ I have problems much of this piece and I recommend you read
+ <xref linkend="krawitz"> at the same time you read Monty's
+ article for a good critique.
+ </para>
+ </abstract>
+ </biblioset>
+ </biblioentry>
+
+ <biblioentry>
+ <biblioset>
+ <author>
+ <surname>Gabriel</surname>
+ <firstname>Richard</firstname>
+ </author>
+
+ <title><ulink
+ url="http://www.jwz.org/doc/worse-is-better.html">The Rise of
+ <quote>Worse is Better</quote></ulink></title>
+
+ <abstract>
+ <para>
+ A well written article although I think the title may have
+ confused as many people as the rest of the essay helped. It
+ offers a good description of how to design programs that will
+ succeed and stay maintainable as they grow.
+ </para>
+ </abstract>
+ </biblioset>
+ </biblioentry>
+ </bibliodiv>
+
+ <bibliodiv>
+ <title>Advogato Articles</title>
+
+ <para>
+ I've found that one of the best resources that any free software
+ developer has at his or her disposal is Advogato.org. If you haven't
+ yet had a chance to visit <ulink url="http://www.advogato.org">the
+ website</ulink>, do.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ I have spent a huge amount of time on advogato and I've gone
+ through and provided links to the articles that I think might be
+ of particular interest to anyone reading this HOWTO. I think that
+ skimming through these links can be helfpul and I promise that if
+ you do, you'll learn a lot. You will learn that my idea of how a
+ free software project should be run is not the
+ <emphasis>only</emphasis> idea. I think that's important.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ If nothing else, there is <emphasis>way</emphasis> more
+ information on that website than I could ever fit into, or
+ reference from this HOWTO. I have listed what I think are the most
+ relavant articles here with short descriptions that I've written.
+ </para>
+
+
+ <biblioentry>
+ <biblioset>
+ <author>
+ <surname>Hindle</surname>
+ <firstname>Stephen</firstname>
+ </author>
+
+ <title><ulink url="http://www.advogato.org/article/262.html">'Best Practices' for Open Source?</ulink></title>
+
+ <publisher>
+ <publishername><ulink url="http://www.advogato.org">Advogato</ulink></publishername>
+ </publisher>
+ <pubdate>March 21, 2001</pubdate>
+
+ <abstract>
+ <para>
+ Touching mostly on programming practice (as most articles on
+ the subject usually do), the article talks a little about
+ project managment (<quote>Use it!</quote>) and a bit about
+ communication within a free software project.
+ </para>
+ </abstract>
+ </biblioset>
+ </biblioentry>
+
+ <biblioentry>
+ <biblioset>
+ <author>
+ <surname>Cohen</surname>
+ <firstname>Bram</firstname>
+ </author>
+
+ <title><ulink
+ url="http://www.advogato.org/article/258.html"></ulink>How to
+ Write Maintainable Code</title>
+
+ <publisher>
+ <publishername><ulink url="http://www.advogato.org">Advogato</ulink></publishername>
+ </publisher>
+ <pubdate>March 15, 2001</pubdate>
+
+ <abstract>
+ <para>
+ This article touches upon the "writing maintainable code"
+ discussion that I try hard to avoid in my HOWTO. It's one of
+ the better (and most diplomatic) articles on the subject that
+ I've found.
+ </para>
+ </abstract>
+ </biblioset>
+ </biblioentry>
+ <biblioentry id="krawitz">
+ <biblioset>
+ <author>
+ <surname>Krawitz</surname>
+ <firstname>Robert</firstname>
+ </author>
+
+ <title><ulink url="http://www.advogato.org/article/196.html">Free
+ Source Project Management</ulink></title>
+
+ <publisher>
+ <publishername><ulink url="http://www.advogato.org">Advogato</ulink></publishername>
+ </publisher>
+ <pubdate>November 4, 2000</pubdate>
+
+ <abstract>
+ <para>
+ This article made me happy because it challenged many of the
+ problems that I had with Monty's article on <ulink
+ url="http://www.linuxprogramming.com">LinuxProgramming</ulink>. The
+ author argues that Monty calls simply for the application of
+ old (proprietary software) project management techniques in
+ free software projects instead of working to come up with
+ something new. I found his article to be extremely well thought
+ out and I think it's an essential read for any free software
+ project manager.
+ </para>
+ </abstract>
+ </biblioset>
+ </biblioentry>
+
+ <biblioentry>
+ <biblioset>
+ <author>
+ <surname>Martins</surname>
+ <firstname>Lalo</firstname>
+ </author>
+
+ <title><ulink url="http://www.advogato.org/article/128.html">Ask
+ the Advogatos: why do Free Software projects
+ fail?</ulink></title>
+
+ <publisher>
+ <publishername><ulink url="http://www.advogato.org">Advogato</ulink></publishername>
+ </publisher>
+ <pubdate>July 20, 2000</pubdate>
+
+ <abstract>
+ <para>
+ While the article is little more than a question, reading the
+ answers to this question offered by advogato's readers can
+ help. In a lot of ways, this HOWTO acts as my answer to the
+ questions posed in this article but there are others, many of
+ which might take issue with whats is in this HOWTO. It's worth
+ checking out.
+ </para>
+ </abstract>
+ </biblioset>
+ </biblioentry>
+
+ <biblioentry>
+ <biblioset>
+ <author>
+ <surname>Burley</surname>
+ <firstname>David</firstname>
+ </author>
+
+ <title><ulink
+ url="http://www.advogato.org/article/107.html">In-Roads to Free
+ Software Development</ulink></title>
+
+ <publisher>
+ <publishername><ulink url="http://www.advogato.org">Advogato</ulink></publishername>
+ </publisher>
+ <pubdate>June 14, 2000</pubdate>
+
+ <abstract>
+ <para>
+ This document was written as a response to <ulink
+ url="http://www.advogato.org/article/72.html">another advogato
+ article</ulink>. Although not about running a project, this
+ describes some of the ways that you can get started with free
+ software development without starting a project. I think this
+ is an important article. If you are interested in becoming
+ involved with free software, this article showcases some of the
+ ways that you can do this without actually starting a project
+ (something that I hope this HOWTO has demonstrated is not to be
+ taken lightly).
+ </para>
+ </abstract>
+ </biblioset>
+ </biblioentry>
+
+ <biblioentry>
+ <biblioset>
+ <author>
+ <surname>Moorman</surname>
+ <firstname>Jacob</firstname>
+ </author>
+
+ <title><ulink
+ url="http://www.advogato.org/article/72.html"></ulink>Importance
+ of Non-Developer Supporters in Free Software</title>
+
+ <publisher>
+ <publishername><ulink url="http://www.advogato.org">Advogato</ulink></publishername>
+ </publisher>
+ <pubdate>April 16, 2000</pubdate>
+
+ <abstract>
+ <para>
+ Moorman's is a short article but it brings up some good
+ points. The comment reminding developers to thank their testers
+ and end-users is invaluable and oft-forgotten.
+ </para>
+ </abstract>
+ </biblioset>
+ </biblioentry>
+
+ <biblioentry>
+ <biblioset>
+ <author>
+ <surname>Orchard</surname>
+ <firstname>Leslie</firstname>
+ </author>
+
+ <title><ulink url="http://www.advogato.org/article/67.html">On
+ Naming an Open Source Project</ulink></title>
+
+ <publisher>
+ <publishername><ulink url="http://www.advogato.org">Advogato</ulink></publishername>
+ </publisher>
+ <pubdate>April 12, 2000</pubdate>
+
+ <abstract>
+ <para>
+ I didn't even have a section on project naming in this HOWTO
+ (See <xref linkend="naming">) until Leslie Orchard's article
+ reminded me of it. Thanks to Leslie for writing this article!
+ </para>
+ </abstract>
+ </biblioset>
+ </biblioentry>
+
+ <biblioentry>
+ <biblioset>
+ <author>
+ <surname>Allen</surname>
+ <firstname>David</firstname>
+ </author>
+
+ <title><ulink url="http://www.advogato.org/article/40.html">Version Numbering Madness</ulink></title>
+
+ <publisher>
+ <publishername><ulink url="http://www.advogato.org">Advogato</ulink></publishername>
+ </publisher>
+ <pubdate>Februrary 28, 2000</pubdate>
+
+ <abstract>
+ <para>
+ In this article, David Allen challengs the whole
+ <quote>Major.Minor.Patch</quote> version numbering scheme. Its
+ good to read this as you read <xref
+ linkend="chooseversioning">. I liked the article and it
+ describes some of the projects that I bring up in my discussion
+ of verion numbering.
+ </para>
+ </abstract>
+ </biblioset>
+ </biblioentry>
+
+ </bibliodiv>
+ </bibliography>
projects / fspm_howto / blobdiff