fixed issue from gzlist@googlemail.com

[fspm_howto] / FreeSoftwareProjectManagementHOWTO.sgml

diff --git a/FreeSoftwareProjectManagementHOWTO.sgml b/FreeSoftwareProjectManagementHOWTO.sgml
index 882db87aaa09982820d2905579623fb6b91cc60a..468e160129be696a0db065096fd372432b524d3e 100644 (file)
--- a/FreeSoftwareProjectManagementHOWTO.sgml
+++ b/FreeSoftwareProjectManagementHOWTO.sgml
@@ -23,43 +23,43 @@
    <revision>
     <revnumber>v0.3.3</revnumber>
     <date>22 August 2008</date>
-   <authorinitials>bch</authorinitials>
+   <authorinitials>bmh</authorinitials>
    </revision>
    <revision>
 
     <revnumber>v0.3.2</revnumber>
     <date>15 April 2002</date>
-   <authorinitials>bch</authorinitials>
+   <authorinitials>bmh</authorinitials>
    </revision>
 
    <revision>
     <revnumber>v0.3.1</revnumber>
     <date>18 June 2001</date>
-    <authorinitials>bch</authorinitials>
+    <authorinitials>bmh</authorinitials>
    </revision>
 
    <revision>
     <revnumber>v0.3</revnumber>
     <date>5 May 2001</date>
-    <authorinitials>bch</authorinitials>
+    <authorinitials>bmh</authorinitials>
    </revision>
 
    <revision>
     <revnumber>v0.2.1</revnumber>
     <date>10 April 2001</date>
-    <authorinitials>bch</authorinitials>
+    <authorinitials>bmh</authorinitials>
    </revision>
 
    <revision>
     <revnumber>v0.2</revnumber>
     <date>8 April 2001</date>
-    <authorinitials>bch</authorinitials>
+    <authorinitials>bmh</authorinitials>
    </revision>
 
    <revision>
     <revnumber>v0.01</revnumber>
     <date>27 March 2001</date>
-    <authorinitials>bch</authorinitials>
+    <authorinitials>bmh</authorinitials>
     <revremark>Initial Release</revremark>
    </revision>
   </revhistory>
@@ -738,12 +738,7 @@
      change and improve the software.</quote> There are plenty of
      other licenses that also conform to the <acronym>DFSG</acronym>
      but sticking with a more well-known license will offer the
-     advantage of immediate recognition and understanding.  Many
-     people write three or four sentences in a COPYING file and assume
-     that they have written a free software license--as my long
-     experience with the debian-legal mailing professes, this is very
-     often not the case.
-    </para>
+     advantage of immediate recognition and understanding.</para>
 
     <para>
      In attempting a more in-depth analysis, I agree with Karl Fogel's
@@ -1117,9 +1112,7 @@ for details.
      through the Linux Documentation project <acronym>(LDP)</acronym>
      and is written by Jens Schweikhardt. It is available <ulink
      url="http://www.schweikhardt.net/man_page_howto.html">from
-     Schweikhardt's site</ulink> or <ulink
-     url="http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/mini/Man-Page.html">from the
-     <acronym>LDP</acronym></ulink>.
+     Schweikhardt's site</ulink>.
     </para>
 
     <para>