</indexterm>
<para>
- For various reasons, this realease has been codenamed the
- <emphasis>homade yogurt</emphasis> release.
+ For various reasons, this release has been code-named the
+ <emphasis>homemade yogurt</emphasis> release.
</para>
<para>
</para>
<para>
- Skimming through Freshmeat provides mountains of reasons for this
+ Skimming through freshmeat.net provides mountains of reasons for this
HOWTO's existence--the Internet is littered with excellently
written and useful programs that have faded away into the Universe
of Free Software Forgottenness. This dismal scene made me ask
chance-an edge. If you write a piece of crap that no one is
interested in, you can read this HOWTO until you recite it in your
sleep and your project will probably fail. Then again, you can
- write a beautiful, relevent piece of software and follow every
+ write a beautiful, relevant piece of software and follow every
instruction in this HOWTO and your software may still not make
it. Sometimes life is like that. However, I'll go out a limb and
say that if you write a great, relevant pieces of software and
<para>
<emphasis>Karl Fogel</emphasis>, the author of <emphasis>Open
Source Development with CVS</emphasis> published by the Coriolis
- Open Press. Large
s parts of the book are available <ulink
+ Open Press. Large parts of the book are available <ulink
url="http://cvsbook.red-bean.com">on the web</ulink>. 225 pages of
the book are available under the GPL and constitute the best
tutorial on CVS I have ever seen. The rest of the book covers,
</para>
<para>
Also providing support and material, and inspiration for this
- HOWTO is Eric S. Raymond for his prolific, consitent, and
+ HOWTO is Eric S. Raymond for his prolific, consistent, and
carefully crafted arguments, to Lawrence Lessig for reminding me
of the importance of Free Software and to every user and developer
involved with the <ulink url="http://www.debian.org">Debian
to practice Free Software advocacy and to make a difference, a
place to learn from those how have been involved with the movement
much longer than I, and an proof of a Free Software project that
- <emphasis>definately, definately works</emphasis>.
+ <emphasis>definitely, definitely works</emphasis>.
</para>
<para>
Above all, I want to thank <emphasis>Richard Stallman</emphasis>
for his work at the Free Software Foundation and for never giving
- up. Stallman provided the philosphical basis that attracts me to
+ up. Stallman provided the philosophical basis that attracts me to
Free Software and that drives me towards writing a document to
make sure it succeeds. RMS can always be emailed at <email>rms
(at) gnu (dot) org</email>.
</para>
<para>
- Starting a project also involves a dilemna that you as a developer
+ Starting a project also involves a dilemma that you as a developer
must try and deal with. No potential user for your program will be
interested by a program that doesn't work. Simultaneously, the
development process that you want to employ holds involvement of
<para>
It is in these dangerous initial moments that anyone working to
start a free software project must strike a balance. One of the
- most important ways that omeone trying to start a project can work
+ most important ways that someone trying to start a project can work
towards this balance is by establishing a framework for the
development process through some of the ways mentioned in this
section.
already have an idea for a project in mind. Chances are pretty
good, it fills a gap by doing something that no other free
software process does or or does it in a way that is unique
- enought to necessitate a seperate project.
+ enough to necessitate a separate project.
</para>
<sect3 id=identifyidea>
- <title>Indentify and articulate your idea</title>
+ <title>Identify and articulate your idea</title>
<para>
Eric S. Raymond writes about how free software projects start in
his paper, "The Cathedral and the Bazaar" which comes as required
- reading for any free softare development. You can find it <ulink
- url="http://www.tuxedo.org/!esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/">online
+ reading for any free soft
ware development. You can find it <ulink
+ url="http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/">online
</ulink>.
</para>
<para>
If you have an idea for a program in mind, chances are good that
- it it is targetting a specific problem or itch you want to see
+ it it is targeting a specific problem or itch you want to see
scratched. <emphasis>This idea is the project. Articulate it
clearly. Write it out. Describe the problem you will attack in
detail. The success of your project in tackling a particular
Before you move any further into this HOWTO, you need to
determine if the free software development model really is the
right one for your project. Obviously, since the program
- scratches your itch, you are definately interested in seeing it
+ scratches your itch, you are definitely interested in seeing it
implemented in code. But, because one hacker coding alone fails
to qualify as a free software development effort, you need to ask
yourself the question: <emphasis>Is anybody else
<para>
Sometimes the answer is <emphasis>no</emphasis>. If you want to
- write a set of scripts to sort <emphasis>your</emphasis> MP3
- collection on your machine, maybe the free software development
- model is not the best one to choose. However, if you want to
- write a set of scripts to sort <emphasis>anyone's</emphasis>
- MP3s, a free software project might fill a useful gap.
+ write a set of scripts to sort <emphasis>your</emphasis>
+ <acronym>MP3</acronym> collection on your machine, maybe the free
+ software development model is not the best one to
+ choose. However, if you want to write a set of scripts to sort
+ <emphasis>anyone's</emphasis> <acronym>MP3</acronym>s, a free
+ software project might fill a useful gap.
</para>
<para>
provides <quote>News for Nerds: Stuff that Matters,</quote>
which usually includes discussion of free software, open
source, technology, and geek culture new and events. It is
- not unusual for an particularly sexy develpment effort to be
- announced here so it definately worth checking.</para>
+ not unusual for an particularly sexy development effort to be
+ announced here so it definitely worth checking.</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<term>SourceForge:</term>
<listitem>
<para><ulink url="http://sourceforge.net">SourceForge</ulink>
- houses and facilitates a growning number of open source and
+ houses and facilitates a growing number of open source and
free software projects, SourceForge is quickly becoming a
nexus and an necessary stop for free software
developers. SourceForge's <ulink
embarking on a new free software project. SourceForge also
provides a at <ulink
url="http://sourceforge.net/snippet/">Code Snippet
- Library</ulink> which contains useful reusuable chunks of
- code in an array of langauges which can come in useful in any
+ Library</ulink> which contains useful reusable chunks of
+ code in an array of languages which can come in useful in any
project.</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<listitem>
<para><ulink url="http://www.google.com">Google</ulink> and
<ulink url="http://www.google.com/linux"> Google's Linux
- Search</ulink>, provide powwerful web searches that may
+ Search</ulink>, provide powerful web searches that may
reveal people working on similar projects. It is not a
catalog of software or news like freshmeat or Slashdot, but
it is worth checking before you begin pouring your effort
<sect4 id=evalhow>
<title>Deciding to Proceed</title>
<para>
- Once you have successfull charted the terrain and have an idea
+ Once you have successful charted the terrain and have an idea
bout what kinds of similar free software projects exist, every
developer needs to decide whether to proceed with their own
project. It is rare that a new project seeks to accomplish a
development for many developers but it is essential. It is easy
to become fired up by and idea and be caught up in the momentum
and excitement of a new project. It is often extremely difficult
- but it is important that any free software developer rememeber
+ but it is important that any free software developer remember
that the best interests of the of the free software community
and the quickest way to accomplish ones own project's goals and
the goals of similar project can often be accomplished by
<para>
Any discussion of licenses is also sure to generate at least a
- small flamewar as there are strong feelings that some free
+ small flame war as there are strong feelings that some free
software licenses are better than other free software
licenses. This discussion also brings up the question of
<quote>Open Source Software</quote> and the debate around
<quote>Open Source Software</quote> and <quote>Free
Software</quote>. However, because I've written the Free Software
Development HOWTO and not the Open Source Development HOWTO, my
- own allegiences in this argument are out in the open.
+ own allegiances in this argument are out in the open.
</para>
<para>
In attempting to reach a middle ground, I recommend picking any
license that conforms to the <ulink
url="http://www.debian.org/social_contract">Debian Free Software
- Guidlines</ulink>. Examples of these licenses are the
+ Guidelines</ulink>. Examples of these licenses are the
<acronym>GPL</acronym>, the <acronym>BSD</acronym>, and the
Artistic License. Conforming to the definition of Free Software
offered by Richard Stallman in <ulink
uphold,<quote> users' freedom to run, copy, distribute, study,
change and improve the software.</quote> There are other licenses
as well but sticking with a more common license will offer the
- advantage of immediate recognition and undestanding.
+ advantage of immediate recognition and understanding.
</para>
<para>
<listitem>
<para>If at all possible, attach and distribute a full copy of
- the license with the source and binary in a seperate
+ the license with the source and binary in a separate
file.</para>
</listitem>
Please, please, please, place your software under some
license. It may not seem important, and to you, it may not be,
but licenses are important. For a piece of software to be
- included in the Debian GNU/Linux distrobution, it must have a
+ included in the Debian GNU/Linux distribution, it must have a
license that fits the <ulink
url="http://www.debian.org/social_contract">Debian Free Software
Guidelines</ulink>. If you have no license, your program can be
- distributed in part of Debian until you rerelease it under a free
+ distributed in part of Debian until you re-release it under a free
license. Please save yourself and others trouble by releasing the
first version of your software with a clear license.
</para>
Whether you plan on having a split development model (as
described in <xref linkend="branches">) or only one version
released at a time, my experience with several free software
- projects and with the Debian project has taught me taht use of
+ projects and with the Debian project has taught me that use of
Linux's version numbering system is worth taking into
consideration. In Debian, all minor versions are stable
distributions (2.0, 2.1, etc). However, many people assume that
2.1 is an unstable or development version and continue to use
- an older version until they get so frusterated with the lack of
+ an older version until they get so frustrated with the lack of
development and progress that they complain. If you never
release an odd minor version but only release even ones, nobody
is hurt, and less people are confused.
achievable goal, wine is released every three weeks. Wine does
this by versioning their releases in Year Month Day format where
each release might be labeled <quote>wine-XXXXXXXX</quote> where
- the version from Janurary 04, 2000 would be
+ the version from January 04, 2000 would be
<quote>wine-20000104</quote>. For certain projects, Year Month
Day format can make a lot of sense.
</para>
<varlistentry>
<term>Mozilla milestones:</term>
<listitem>
- <para>When one considers Netscape 6 and verdor versions, the
+ <para>When one considers Netscape 6 and vendor versions, the
mozilla's project development structure is one of the most
complex free software model available. Their version numbering
has reflected the unique situation in which it is
<para>
Mozilla's development structure has historically been made up
- of milestones. From teh beginning of the mozilla project, the
+ of milestones. From the beginning of the mozilla project, the
goals of the project in the order and degree to which they were
to be achieved were charted out on a series of <ulink
url="http://www.mozilla.org/roadmap.html">road
- maps</ulink>. Major points and achievements along this roadmaps
+ maps</ulink>. Major points and achievements along this road-maps
were marked as milestones. Therefore, mozilla was built and
distributed nightly as "nightly builds" but on a day when the
- goals of a milestone on the roadmap had been reached, that
- particular build was marked as a milstone release.
+ goals of a milestone on the road-map had been reached, that
+ particular build was marked as a milestone release.
</para>
<para>
necessary for the survival of your project. You will learn later
in <xref linkend="releasing"> that you must always release
something that is usable. <emphasis>A piece of software without
- documentation is not usuable.</emphasis>
+ documentation is not usable.</emphasis>
</para>
<para>
<para>
It is also possible to write man pages using DocBook SGML and
- convert them into man pages. Because manpages are so simple, I
+ convert them into man pages. Because man pages are so simple, I
have not been able to follow this up but would love help from
anyone who can give me more information on how exactly this is
done.
</sect3>
<sect3>
- <title>Command line accessable documentation</title>
+ <title>Command line accessible documentation</title>
<para>
Most users will expect the most basic amount of documentation to
- be easily availabe from the command line. For few programs should
+ be easily available from the command line. For few programs should
then documentation extend for more than one screen (24 or 25
lines) but it should cover the basic usage, a brief (one or two
- sentance) description of the program, a list of commands, all the
+ sentence) description of the program, a list of commands, all the
major options, and a pointer to more in-depth documentation for
those who need it. The command line documentation for Debian's
apt-get serves as an excellent example and a useful model:
<para>
It has become a GNU convention to make this information
- accessable with the <quote>-h</quote> and the
+ accessible with the <quote>-h</quote> and the
<quote>--help</quote> options. Most GNU/Linux users will expect
to be able to retrieve basic documentation these ways so if you
choose to use different method, be prepared for the flames and
In addition to man pages and online help, there are certain files
where people will look to documentation, especially in any
package containing source code. In a source distribution, most of
- these files can be stored in a the root directery of the source
+ these files can be stored in a the root directory of the source
distribution or in a subdirectory of the root called
<quote>doc</quote> or <quote>Documentation</quote>. These files include:
</para>
<listitem>
<para>
A document containing all the basic installation,
- compiliation, and even basic use instructions that make up
+ compilation, and even basic use instructions that make up
the bare minimum information needed to get the program up and
running. A README is not your chance to be verbose but needs
to be concise and effective. An ideal README is at least 30
<listitem>
<para>
The INSTALL file should be much shorter than the INSTALL file
- and should quicly and concisely describe how to build and
+ and should quickly and concisely describe how to build and
install the program. Usually an install simply instructs the
user to run ./configure; make; make install and touches on
any unusual options that may be necessary. More advanced
software project should include. A changelog is simple the
file that, as its name would imply, logs or documents the
changes to a program. The most simple way to do a changelog
- is to simply keep a file with teh source code for your
+ is to simply keep a file with the source code for your
program and add a section to the top of the changelog with
each release describing what has been, changed, fixed, or
added to the program. It's a good idea to post the changelog
onto the website as well because it can help people decide
whether they want or need to upgrade to a newer version or
- wait for a more signifigant upgrade.
+ wait for a more significant upgrade.
</para>
</listitem>
are asked a question or see a question on a mailing list two
or more times, add it the question (and its answer) to your
FAQs. FAQs are more optional than the files listed above but
- they can save your time, increase useability, and decrease
+ they can save your time, increase usability, and decrease
headaches on all sides.
</para>
</listitem>
source code is always available in tar'ed and gzip'ed format
(.tar.gz). UNIX compress (.Z) has gone out of style and
usefulness and faster computers have brought bzip2 (.bz2) into
- the spotlit as a more effective compression medium. I now make
+ the spot-lit as a more effective compression medium. I now make
all my releases available in both gzip'ed and bzip2'ed formats.
</para>
good idea to provide RedHat <acronym>RPM</acronym>'s (.rpm),
Debian deb's (.deb) and source <acronym>RPM</acronym>'s
<acronym>SRPM</acronym>'s. Binary packages can also be compiled
- against a specified system with specificed libraries and
+ against a specified system with specified libraries and
distributed in tar.gz format as well. <emphasis>Remember: While
- these binaries packages are nice, geting the source packaged and
+ these binaries packages are nice, getting the source packaged and
released should always be your priority. Other can and will do
the the binary packages for you.</emphasis>
</para>
<para>
<emphasis>Make sure that your program can always be found in a
single location.</emphasis> Often this means that you have a
- single directory access
able via <acronym>FTP</acronym> or
+ single directory access
ible via <acronym>FTP</acronym> or
<acronym>HTTP</acronym> where the newest version will be
quickly recognized. One effective technique is a provide a
symlink called <quote>projectname-latest</quote> that is
<sect1 id="developers">
<title>Maintaining a Project: Interacting with Developers</title>
- <indexterm>
-
<primary>fswd!developers</primary>
- </indexterm>
+ <indexterm>
+ <primary>fswd!developers</primary>
+ </indexterm>
<para>
Once you have gotten the project started, you have gotten over the
process itself is equally important and provides an equal number of
opportunities for failure. In the next two sections, I will and
cover running a project by discussing how to maintain a project
- rhough interactions with developers and with users.
+ rough interactions with developers and with users.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ In releasing your program, your program becomes free software. This
+ transition is more than just a larger user base. By releasing your
+ program as free software, <emphasis>your</emphasis> software
+ becomes the <emphasis>free software community's</emphasis>
+ software. The direction of your software's development will be
+ reshaped, redirected, and fully determined by your users and, to a
+ larger extent, by other developers in the community.
</para>
<para>
- The difference between free software development and propriety
- software development is th developer base. As the leader of a free
+ The major difference between free software development and propriety
+ software development is the developer base. As the leader of a free
software project, you need to attract and keep developers in a way
- that leaders of proprietary software projects sipmly don't have to
+ that leaders of proprietary software projects simply don't have to
worry about. <emphasis>As the person leading development of a free
software project, you must harness the work of fellow developers by
making responsible decisions and by and by choosing not to make
</para>
<para>
- Delegation is the politcal way of describing this process of
+ Delegation is the political way of describing this process of
<quote>letting go.</quote> It is the process of handing some of
- the responsibility and power over your project to other reponsible
+ the responsibility and power over your project to other responsible
and involved developers. It is difficult for anyone who has
invested a large deal of time and energy into a project but it
essential for the growth of any free software project. One person
<para>
As your project progresses, you will notice people who are putting
- signfigant amounts of time and effort into your project. These
+ significant amounts of time and effort into your project. These
will be the people submitting the most patches, posting most on
the mailing lists, engaging in long email discussions. It is your
- responsiblity to contact these people and to try and shift some of
- the power and responsiblity of your position as the project's
+ responsibility to contact these people and to try and shift some of
+ the power and responsibility of your position as the project's
maintainer onto them (if they want it). There are several easy
- weays you can do this:
+ ways you can do this:
</para>
<sect3>
<para>
Like anything, its easier to see how others delegate than to do
- it yourself. In a sentance: <emphasis>Keep an eye out for other
+ it yourself. You may find that other developers seem even more
+ experienced or knowledgeable than you. Your job as a maintainer
+ does not mean you have to have to be the best or the
+ brightest. It means you need are responsible for showing good
+ judgment and for recognizing solutions that are maintainable and
+ are not. In a sentence: <emphasis>Keep an eye out for other
qualified developers who show an interest and sustained
involvement with your project and try and shift responsibility
towards them.</emphasis> The following ideas might be good places
- to start or good sources of inspiriation:
+ to start or good sources of inspiration:
</para>
<sect4>
<title>Allow a larger group of people write access to your CVS
- reponsitory and make real efforts towards rule by a
+ repository and make real efforts towards rule by a
committee</title>
<para>
is an extreme example of rule by committee. At current count,
more than 700 developers have full responsibility for certain
aspects of the projects. All these developers can upload into
- the main ftp servers, and vote on major issues. Direction for
+ the main FTP servers, and vote on major issues. Direction for
the project is determined by the project <ulink
url="http://www.debian.org/social_contract">social
contract</ulink> and a <ulink
url="http://www.debian.org/devel/constitution">constitution</ulink>. To
facilitate this system, there are special teams (i.e. the
install team, the Japanese language team) and a technical
- committee and a project lead. There is a project lead as well
- but the lead's main responsiblity is to, <quote>Appoint
+ committee and a project lead. There is a project leader as well
+ but the leader's main responsibility is to, <quote>Appoint
Delegates or delegate decisions to the Technical
Committee.</quote>
</para>
project will not (at least initially), their example is
helpful. Debian's idea of a project who lead who can do
<emphasis>nothing</emphasis> but delegate can serve as a
- charicature of how a project can involve and empower a huge
+ caricature of how a project can involve and empower a huge
number of developers and grow to a huge size.
</para>
</sect4>
- <sect4>
+ <sect4 id="releasemanager">
<title>Publicly appoint someone as the release manager for a
specific release.</title>
<para>
- A relase manager is usually responsible for coordinating
- testing, encforcing a code freeze, being responsible for
+ A release manager is usually responsible for coordinating
+ testing, enforcing a code freeze, being responsible for
stability and quality control, packaging up the software, and
- placing it in the approrpriate places to be downloaded.
+ placing it in the appropriate places to be downloaded.
</para>
<para>
This use of the release manager is a good way to give yourself a
break and to shift the responsibility for accepting and
- rejecting patches to somenoe else. It is a good way of very
+ rejecting patches to someone else. It is a good way of very
clearly defining a chunk of work on the project as belonging to
a certain person and its a great way of giving yourself a break.
</para>
</sect4>
- <sect4>
+ <sect4 id="delegatebranch">
<title>Delegate control of an entire branch.</title>
<para>
If your project chooses to have branches (as described in <xref
else to be the the head of a branch. If you like focusing your
energy on development releases and the implementation of new
features, had total control over the stable releases to a
- well-suiteded developer.
+ well-suited developer.
</para>
<para>
- The author of linux, Linus Torvalds, came out and crowned Alan
+ The author of Linux, Linus Torvalds, came out and crowned Alan
Cox as <quote>the man for stable kernels.</quote> All patches
for stable kernels go to Alan and, if Linus were to be taken
- away from work on linux for any reason, Alan Cox would be more
+ away from work on Linux for any reason, Alan Cox would be more
than suited to fill his role as the acknowledged heir to the
- linux maintainership.
+ Linux maintainership.
</para>
</sect4>
</sect3>
<sect2 id="patching">
<title>Accepting and Rejecting Patches</title>
- <para></para>
- </sect2>
+ <para>
+ This HOWTO has already touched on the fact that as the maintainer
+ of a free software project, one of primary and most important
+ responsibilities will be accepting and rejecting patches submitted
+ to you by other developers.
+ </para>
+
+ <sect3>
+ <title>Technical judgment</title>
+
+ <para>
+ In <emphasis>Open Source Development with CVS</emphasis>, Karl
+ Fogel makes a convincing argument that the most important things
+ to keep in mind are a firm knowledge of the scope of your program
+ (that's the <quote>idea</quote> I talked about in <xref
+ linkend="chooseproject">) and the ability to recognize,
+ facilitate, and direct <quote>evolution</quote> of a free
+ software program so that the program can grow and change and
+ incorporate functionality that was originally unforeseen but avoid
+ digressions that might expand the scope of the program too much
+ and result and push the project towards an early death under its
+ own weight and unwieldiness. These are the criteria that you as a
+ project maintainer should take into account each time you receive
+ a patch.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ Fogel elaborates on this again and states the <quote>the
+ questions to ask yourself when considering whether to implement
+ (or approve) a change are:</quote>
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ <itemizedlist>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <para>Will it benefit a significant percentage of the program's
+ user community?</para>
+ </listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <para>Does it fit within the program's domain or within a
+ natural, intuitive extension of that domain?</para>
+ </listitem>
+
+ </itemizedlist>
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ The answers to these questions are never straightforward and its
+ very possible (and even likely) that the person who submitted the
+ patch may feel differently about the answer to those questions
+ than you do. However, if you feel that that the answer to either
+ of those questions is <quote>no,</quote> it is your responsibility
+ to reject the change. If you fail to do this, the project will
+ become unwieldy and unmaintainable and will ultimately fail.
+ </para>
+ </sect3>
+
+ <sect3>
+ <title>Rejecting patches</title>
+
+ <para>
+ Rejecting patches is probably the most difficult and the most
+ sensitive job that the maintainer of any free software project
+ has to face. But sometimes it has to be done. I mentioned earlier
+ (in <xref linkend="developers"> and in <xref
+ linkend="delegation">) that any developer needs to try and
+ balance your responsibility and power to make what you think are
+ the best technical decisions with the fact that you will lose
+ support from other developers if you seem like you are on a
+ power trip or being overly bossy or possessive of a community-based
+ project. I recommend that you keep three major facts in mind when
+ rejecting patches (or other changes):
+ </para>
+
+ <sect4>
+ <title>Bring it to the community</title>
+ <para>
+ One of the best ways of justifying a decision to reject a patch
+ and working to not seem like you keep an iron grip on your
+ project is by not making the decision alone at all. It might
+ make sense to turn over larger proposed changes or more
+ difficult decisions to a development mailing list where they can
+ be discussed. There will be some patches (bug fixes, etc.) which
+ will definitely be accepted and some that you feel are so off
+ base that they do not even merit further discussion. It is those
+ that fall into the grey area between these two groups that might
+ merit a quick forward to a mailing list.
+ </para>
+ <para>
+ I recommend this process wholeheartedly. As the project
+ maintainer you are worried about making the best decision for
+ the project, for the project's users and developers, and for
+ yourself as a responsible project leader. Turning things over to
+ an email list will demonstrate your own responsible and
+ responsive leadership as it tests and serves the interests of
+ your software's community.
+ </para>
+ </sect4>
+
+ <sect4>
+ <title>Technical issues is not always good justification</title>
+ <para>
+ Especially towards the beginning, you will find that many
+ changes are difficult to implement, introduce new bugs, or have
+ other technical problems. Try to see past these. Especially with
+ added functionality, good ideas do not always come from good
+ coders. Technical merit is a valid reason to postpone the
+ application of a patch but it is not always a good reason to
+ reject a change outright. Even small changes are worth the
+ effort of working with the developer submitting the patch to iron out bugs and
+ incorporate the change if you thing you think it seems like a
+ good addition to your project. The effort on your part will work
+ to make your project a community project and it will pull a new
+ or less experienced developer onto your project and even teach
+ them something that might help them in their next patch.
+ </para>
+ </sect4>
+
+ <sect4>
+ <title>Common courtesy</title>
+ <para>
+ It should go without saying but, <emphasis>above all and in all
+ cases, just be nice.</emphasis> If someone has an idea and cares
+ about it enough to write some code and submit a patch, they
+ care, they are motivated, and they are already involved. Your
+ goal as the maintainer is make sure they submit again. They may
+ have thrown you a dud this time but next time may be the idea or
+ feature that revolutionizes your project.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ It is your responsibility to first justify your action to not
+ incorporate their change clearly and concisely. Then thank
+ them. Let them know that you a appreciate their help and feel
+ horrible that you can't incorporate their change. Let them know
+ that you look forward to their staying involved and you hope
+ that the next patch or idea meshes better with your project
+ because you appreciate their work and want to see it in the
+ project. If you have ever had a patch rejected that put a large
+ deal of time, thought, and energy into, you remember how it
+ feels and it feels bad. Keep this in mind when you have to let
+ someone down. It's never easy but you need to do everything you
+ have to make it as not-unpleasant as possible.
+ </para>
+ </sect4>
+ </sect3>
+ </sect2>
<!-- Section2: branches -->
<sect2 id="branches">
<title>Stable and Development Branches</title>
- <para></para>
+
+ <para>
+ The idea of stable and development branches has already been
+ described briefly in <xref linkend="chooseversioning"> and in
+ <xref linkend="delegatebranch">. These alludes attest to the fact
+ to some of the ways that multiple branches can affect your
+ software. Branches can let you avoid (to some extent) some of the
+ problems around rejecting patches (as described in <xref
+ linkend="patching">) by allowing you to temporarily compromise the
+ stability of your project without affected those users who need
+ that stability.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ The most common way of branching your project is to have one
+ branch that is stable and one that is development. This is the
+ model followed by the Linux kernel that is described in <xref
+ linkend="chooseversioning">. In this model, there is always one
+ branch that is stable and always one that is in
+ development. Before any new release, the development branch goes
+ into a <quote>feature freeze</quote> where major changes and added
+ features are rejected or put on hold under the development kernel
+ is released as the new stable branch and major development begins
+ again on the development branch. Bug fixes and small changes that
+ are unlikely to have any large negative repercussions are
+ incorporated into the stable branch also to the development
+ branch.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ Linux's model is an extreme one. On many projects, there is no
+ need to have two versions always available. It may make sense to
+ have two versions only near a release. The Debian project has
+ historically made both a stable and an unstable distribution
+ available but has expanded to this to include: stable, unstable,
+ testing, experimental, and (around release time) a frozen
+ distribution that only incorporates bug fixes during the
+ transition from unstable to stable. There are few projects whose
+ size would necessitate a system like Debian but their use of
+ branches helps demonstrate how they can be used to balance
+ consistent and effective development with the need to make regular
+ and usable releases.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ In trying to set up a development tree for yourself, there are
+ several things that might be useful to keep in mind:
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ <variablelist>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term>Minimize the number of branches</term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ Debian may be able to make good use of four or five branches
+ but it contains gigabytes of software in over 5000 packages
+ compiled for a 5-6 different architectures. Two is a good
+ number. Too many branches will confuse your users (I can't
+ count how many times I had to describe Debian's system when it
+ only had 2 and sometimes 3 branches!), potential developers
+ and even yourself. Branches can help but they come at a cost
+ so use them very sparingly.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term>Make sure that all your different branches are explained</term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ As I mentioned in the preceding paragraph, different branches
+ <emphasis>will</emphasis> confuse your users. Do everything
+ you can to avoid this by clearly explaining the different
+ branches in a prominent page on your website and in a Readme
+ file in the <acronym>FTP</acronym> or <acronym>HTTP</acronym>
+ directory.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ I might also recommend against a mistake that I think Debian
+ has made. The terms <quote>unstable,</quote>
+ <quote>testing,</quote> and <quote>experimental</quote> are
+ vague and difficult to rank in order of stability (or
+ instability as the case may be). Try explaining to someone
+ that <quote>stable</quote> actually means <quote>ultra
+ stable</quote> and that <quote>unstable</quote> doesn't
+ actually include any unstable software but is really stable
+ software that is untested as a distribution.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ If you are going to do branches, especially early on, keep in
+ mind that people are conditioned to understand the terms
+ <quote>stable</quote> and <quote>development</quote> and you
+ probably can't go wrong with this simple and common division of
+ branches.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term>Make sure all your branches are always available</term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ Like a lot of document, this should probably should go without
+ saying but experience has taught me that it's not always
+ obvious to people. It's a good idea to physically split up
+ different branches in different directories or directory trees
+ on your <acronym>FTP</acronym> or <acronym>HTTP</acronym>
+ site. Linux accomplishes this by having all the v2.2 and a
+ v2.3 subdirectory where it is immediately obvious (after you
+ know their version numbering scheme) which directory is the
+ most recent stable and the current development
+ releases. Debian accomplishes this by naming all their
+ distribution by name and then changing symlinks named
+ <quote>stable,</quote> <quote>unstable</quote> and
+ <quote>frozen</quote> to point to which ever distribution (by
+ name) is in whatever stage. Both methods work and their are
+ others. In any case, it is important that different branches
+ are always available, are accessible from consistent
+ locations, and that different branches are clearly
+ distinguished from each other so your users know exactly what
+ they want to be downloading and where to get it.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ </variablelist>
+ </para>
+
</sect2>
<!-- Section2: otherdev -->
<sect2 id="otherdev">
<title>Other Development issues</title>
- <para></para>
- </sect2>
+ <para>
+ There are more issues around surrounding interaction with
+ developers in a free software project that I can touch on in great
+ detail in a HOWTO of this size. Please don't hesitate to contact
+ me if you see any major omissions. Other smaller issues that are
+ worth mentioning are:
+ </para>
+ <sect3>
+ <title>Freezing</title>
+ <para>
+ For those projects that choose to adopt a split development model
+ (<xref linkend="branches">), freezing is a concept that is worth
+ becoming familiar with.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ Freeze come in two major forms. A <quote>feature freeze</quote>
+ is a period when no significant functionality is added to a
+ program. It is a period where established functionality (even
+ skeletons of barely working functionality) can be improved and
+ perfected. It is a period where bugs are fixed. This type of
+ freeze is usually applied some period (a month or two) before a
+ release. It is easy to push a release back as you wait for
+ <quote>one more feature</quote> and a freeze helps to avoid this
+ situation by drawing the much needed line in the sand. It gives
+ developers room they need to get a program ready for release.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ The second type of freeze is a <quote>code freeze</quote> which
+ is much more like a released piece of software. Once a piece of
+ software has entered a code freeze, all changes to the code are
+ frowned upon and only changes that fix known bugs are
+ permitted. This type of freeze usually follows a <quote>feature
+ freeze</quote> and directly precedes a release. Most released
+ software is in what could be interpreted as a sort of high
+ level<quote>code freeze.</quote>
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ Even you do not choose to appoint a release manager (<xref
+ linkend="releasemanager">), you will have an easier time
+ justifying the rejection or postponement of patches (<xref
+ linkend="patching"> before a release with a publicly stated
+ freeze in effect.
+ </para>
+ </sect3>
+
+ <sect3>
+ <title>Forking</title>
+ <para>
+ Forks are the most extreme interpretation of a branch. A fork is
+ when a group of developers takes code from a free software
+ project and actually starts a brand new free software
+ project. The most famous example of a fork is Emacs and
+ XEmacs. Both emacsen are based on an almost identical code-base
+ but for technical, political, and philosophical reasons,
+ development was split into two projects which now compete with
+ each other.
+ </para>
+ <para>
+ The short version of the fork section is, <emphasis>don't do
+ them.</emphasis> Forks force developers to choose one project to
+ work with, cause nasty political divisions, redundancy of work.
+ Luckily, usually the threat of the fork is enough to scare the
+ maintainer or maintainers of a project into changing the way they
+ run their project to avoid it.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ In his chapter on <quote>The Open Source Process,</quote> Karl
+ Fogel describes how to do a fork if you absolutely must. If you
+ have determined that is absolutely necessary and that the
+ differences between you and the people threatening to fork are
+ absolutely unresolvable, I recommend Fogel's book as a good place
+ to start.
+ </para>
+ </sect3>
+ </sect2>
</sect1>
<!-- Section1: users -->
<sect1 id="users">
<title>Maintaining a Project: Interacting with Users</title>
+ <indexterm>
+ <primary>fswd!users</primary>
+ </indexterm>
- <indexterm>
- <primary>fswd!users</primary>
- </indexterm>
+ <para>
+ If you've worked your way up to here, congratulations, you are
+ nearing the end of this document. This final section describes some
+ of the situations in which you, in your capacity as project
+ maintainer, will be interacting with users and gives some
+ suggestions on how these situations might be handled effectively.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ Interacting with users is difficult. In our discussion of
+ interaction with developers, the underlying assumption is that in a
+ free software project, a project maintainer must constantly strive to
+ attract and keep developers who can easily leave at any time.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ Users in the free software community are different than users in
+ the world of proprietary software and they should be treated
+ differently. Some ways in which the groups differ significantly
+ follow:
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ <itemizedlist>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <para>The lines between users and developers are blurred in ways
+ that is totally foreign to any proprietary development
+ model. Your users are often your developers and vice
+ versa.</para>
+ </listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <para>In the free software world, you are often your users only
+ choice. Because there is such an emphasis on not replicating the
+ work of others in the free software community and because the
+ element of competition present in the propriety software model is
+ absent (or at least in an extremely different form) in the free
+ software development model your users will probably be the only
+ project that does what you do (or at least the only one that does
+ what you do in the way that you do it). This means your
+ responsiveness to your users is even more important in that in
+ the proprietary world.</para>
+ </listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <para>In an almost paradoxical situation, free software projects
+ have less immediate or dire consequences for ignoring their
+ users--it is often easier to do. Because you don't usually need
+ to compete with another product in the free software model,
+ chances are good that you will not be scrambling to gain the
+ features of the competitor's newest program. This means that your
+ development process will have to be directed either internally,
+ by your users or both.</para>
+ </listitem>
+ </itemizedlist>
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ Trying to tackle this unique situation can only be done
+ indirectly. Developers and maintainers need to listen to users and
+ to try and be as responsive as possible. A solid knowledge of the
+ situation recounted above is any free software developers best tool
+ for shifting his development or leadership style to fit the unique
+ process of free software development. This chapters will try and
+ introduce some of the more difficult or important points in any
+ projects interactions with users and give some hints on how to
+ tackle these.
+ </para>
<!-- Section2: testing -->
<sect2 id="testing">
<title>Testing and Testers</title>
- <para></para>
+
+ <para>
+ In addition to your users being your developers, they are also
+ (and perhaps more commonly) your testers. Before I get flamed, I
+ should rephrase my sentence: <emphasis>some</emphasis> users are
+ your testers.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ It is important that this distinction be made early on because not
+ all of your users wants to be testers. Many users want to use
+ stable software and don't care if they don't have the newest
+ greatest software with the latest and greatest features. These
+ users except a stable, tested piece of software with major or
+ obvious bugs worked out or openly declared and will be angry if
+ they find themselves in a testing position. This is yet another
+ way in which a split development model (as mentioned in <xref
+ linkend="branches">) might come in handy.
+ </para>
+
+ <sect3>
+ <title>Automated testing</title>
+ <para>
+ For many programs, many common and mistakes can be caught by
+ automated means. Automated tests tend to be pretty good at
+ catching errors that you've run into several times before or
+ something you just forget and not very good at finding errors,
+ even major ones, that were totally unforeseen.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ CVS comes with a bourne shell script called sanity.sh that is
+ worth looking at. Debian uses a program called lintian that
+ checks Debian packages for all of the most common errors. While
+ using these scripts may not be possible, there is a host of other
+ sanity checking software on the net that may be applicable (feel
+ free to email any recommendations). None of these will create a
+ bug-free release but they will avoid at least some major
+ oversights. Finally, if your programs become a long term
+ endeavor, you will find that there are certain errors that you
+ tend to make over and over. Start a collection of scripts that
+ check for these errors to help prevent them in the future.
+ </para>
+ </sect3>
+
+ <sect3>
+ <title>Testing by testers</title>
+ <para>
+ For any program that depends on user interactivity, many bugs
+ will only be uncovered through testing by users actually clicking
+ the keys and pressing the mouse buttons. For this you need
+ testers and as many testers as possible.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ The most difficult part of testing is finding testers. It's
+ usually a good tactic to post a message to a relevant mailing
+ list or news group announcing a specific proposed release date
+ and outline the functionality of the program. If you put some
+ time into the announcement, you are sure to get a few bites.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ The second most difficult part of testing is keeping your testers
+ and keeping them actively involved in the testing
+ process. Fortunately, there are some tried and true tactics that
+ can applied towards this end:
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ <itemizedlist>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <para><emphasis>Make things simple for your testers.</emphasis>
+ Your testers are doing you a favor so make it as easy as
+ possible. This means that you should be careful to package your
+ software in a way that is easy to find, unpack, install, and
+ uninstall. This also means you should explain what you are
+ looking for to each tester and make the means for reporting
+ bugs simple and well established. The key is to provide as much
+ structure as possible to make your tester's job easy and
+ maintain as much flexibility as possible for those that want to
+ do things a little differently.</para>
+ </listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <para><emphasis>Be responsive to your testers.</emphasis> When
+ your testers submit bugs, respond to them and respond
+ quickly. Even if you are only responding to tell them that the
+ bug has already been fixed, quick and consistent response make
+ them feel like their work is heard, important, and
+ appreciated.</para>
+ </listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <para><emphasis>Thank your testers.</emphasis> Thank them
+ personally each time they send you patch. Thank them publicly
+ in the documentation and the about section of your program. You
+ appreciate your testers and your program would not be possible
+ without their help. Make sure they know and pat them on the
+ back by making sure the rest of the world knows it too. It will
+ be appreciated more than you expected.</para>
+ </listitem>
+
+ </itemizedlist>
+ </para>
+ </sect3>
</sect2>
<!-- Section2: support -->
<sect2 id="support">
<title>Setting up a Support Infrastructure</title>
- <para></para>
+
+ <para>
+ While testing is important, the large part of your interactions
+ and responsibility to your users falls under the category of
+ support. The best way to make sure your users are adequately
+ supported in using your program is to set up a good infrastructure
+ for this purpose so that your developers and users help each other
+ and less of the burden falls on you while people get quicker and
+ better responses to their questions. This infrastructure comes in
+ several forms:
+ </para>
+
+ <sect3>
+ <title>Documentation</title>
+ <para>
+ It should not come as any surprise that the key element to any
+ support infrastructure is good documentation. This topic was
+ large covered in <xref linkend="documentation"> and will not be
+ repeated here.
+ </para>
+ </sect3>
+
+ <sect3>
+ <title>Mailing lists</title>
+ <para>
+ Aside from documentation, effective mailing lists will be your
+ greatest tool in supporting user support. Running a mailing list
+ well is more complicated than installing mailing list software
+ onto a machine.
+ </para>
+
+ <sect4>
+ <title>Separate lists</title>
+
+ <para>
+ A good idea is too separate your user and development mailing
+ lists (perhaps into project-user@host and project-devel@host)
+ and enforce the division. If people post a development question
+ onto -user, politely ask them to repost it onto -devel and vise
+ versa. Subscribe yourself to both groups and encourage primarily
+ developers to do the same.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ This system provides so that no one person is stuck doing all of
+ the support work and works so that users learn more about the
+ program, they can help new users with their questions.
+ </para>
+ </sect4>
+
+ <sect4>
+ <title>Choose mailing list software well</title>
+ <para>
+ Please don't make the selection of mailing list software
+ lightly. Please consider easy accessibility by users without a
+ lot of technical experience so you want to be as easy as
+ possible. Web accessibility to an archive of the list is also
+ important.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ The two biggest free software mailing list programs are <ulink
+ url="http://www.greatcircle.com/majordomo/">majordomo</ulink>
+ and <ulink url="http://www.list.org/">GNU Mailman</ulink>. A
+ long time advocate of majordomo, I would now recommend any
+ project choose GNU Mailman. It fulfills the criteria listed above
+ and makes it easier to do. It provides a good mailing list
+ program for a free software project maintainer as opposed to a
+ good mailing list application for a mailing list administrator.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ There are other things you want to take in setting up your
+ list. If it is possible to gate your mailing lists to USENET and
+ provide them in digest form as well as making them accessible on
+ the web, you will please some users and work to make the support
+ infrastructure slightly more accessible.
+ </para>
+ </sect4>
+ </sect3>
+
+ <sect3>
+ <title>Other support ideas</title>
+
+ <para>
+ A mailing list and accessible documentation all you can do to set
+ up good user support infrastructure. Be creative. If you stumble
+ across something works well, email me and I'll include it here in
+ the HOWTO.
+ </para>
+ <sect4>
+ <title>Make your self accessible</title>
+ <para>
+ You can not put to few methods to access you. If you hang out in
+ an <acronym>IRC</acronym> channel, don't hesitate to list in
+ your projects documentation. List email and snail mail
+ addresses, or ways to reach you via <acronym>ICQ</acronym>,
+ <acronym>AIM</acronym>, or Jabber.
+ </para>
+ </sect4>
+
+ <sect4>
+ <title>Bug management software</title>
+ <para>
+ For many large software projects, use of bug management software
+ is essential to keep track of which bugs have been fixed, which
+ bugs have not been fixed, and which bugs are being fixed by
+ which people. Debian uses the <ulink
+ url="http://bugs.debian.org">Debian Bug Tracking System</ulink>
+ (<acronym>BTS</acronym>) although it may not be best choice for
+ every project (it seems to currently be buckling under its own
+ weight. As well as a damn good web browser, the mozilla project
+ has spawned a sub-project resulting in a bug tracking system
+ called <ulink
+ url="http://www.mozilla.org/projects/bugzilla/">bugzilla</ulink>.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ These systems (and others like them) can be unwieldy so
+ developers should be careful to not spend more time on the bug
+ tracking system than on the bugs or the projects themselves. If
+ a project continues to grow, use of a bug tracking system can
+ provide an easy standard way for users and testers to report
+ bugs and for developers and maintainers to fix them in an
+ orderly fashion.
+ </para>
+ </sect4>
+ </sect3>
</sect2>
-<!-- Section2: releasing -->
+<!-- Section2: releasing -->
<sect2 id="releasing">
<title>Releasing Your Program</title>
- <para></para>
+
+ <para>
+ As mentioned earlier in the HOWTO, the first rule or releasing is,
+ <emphasis>release something useful.</emphasis> Non-working or
+ not-useful software will not attract anyone to your
+ project. People will be turned off of your project and be likely
+ to simply gloss over it next time they see a new version
+ announced. Half-working software, if useful, will intrigue people,
+ whet their appetites for the version to come, and encourage them
+ to join the development process.
+ </para>
+
+ <sect3>
+ <title>When to release</title>
+
+ <para>
+ Making the decision to release your software for the first time
+ is an incredibly important and incredibly stressful decision. But
+ it needs to be done. My advice is to try and make something that
+ is complete enough to be usable and incomplete enough to allow
+ for flexibility and imagination by your future developers. It's
+ not an easy decision. Ask for help on a local Linux User Group
+ mailing list or from a group of developer friends.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ One tactic is to first do an <quote>alpha</quote> or
+ <quote>beta</quote> release as described below in <xref
+ linkend="alphabeta">. However, most of the guidelines described
+ above still apply.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ <emphasis>When you feel in your gut it is time and you feel
+ you've weighed the situation well several times, cross your
+ fingers and take the plunge.</emphasis>
+ </para>
+ </sect3>
+
+ <sect3>
+ <title>How to release</title>
+
+ <para>
+ If you've followed the guidelines described in this HOWTO up
+ until this point, the mechanics of doing a release are going to
+ be the easy part of releasing. If you have set up a consistent
+ distribution locations and the other infrastructure described in
+ the preceding sections, releasing should be as simple as
+ building the package, checking it once over, and uploading it
+ into the appropriate place and then reflecting the release on
+ your website.
+ </para>
+ </sect3>
+
+ <sect3 id="alphabeta">
+ <title>Alpha, beta, and development releases</title>
+
+ <para>
+ When contemplating releases, it worth considering the fact that
+ not every release needs to be a full numbered release. Software
+ users are accustomed to pre-releases but you must be careful to
+ label these releases accurately or they cause more problems then
+ they are worth.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ <variablelist>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term>alpha releases</term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ Alpha releases are expected to be unstable, perhaps a little
+ unsafe, but definitely usable. Alpha versions should have
+ full functionality and limited testing. They can have known
+ bugs and kinks that have yet to be worked out. Before sure to
+ keep in mind that <emphasis>alpha releases are still
+ releases</emphasis> and people are not going to be expecting
+ a nightly build from the CVS source. An alpha should work and
+ have minimal testing and bug fixing already finished.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term>beta releases</term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ Beta releases are general expected to be usable and
+ slightly unstable, although definitely
+ <emphasis>not</emphasis> unsafe. Beta releases usually
+ preclude a full release by under a month. They can contain
+ small known bugs but no major ones. All major functionality
+ should be fully implemented although the exact mechanics can
+ still be worked out. Beta releases are great tool to whet the
+ appetites of potential users by giving them a very
+ realistic view of where your project is going in the very
+ near future and can help keep interest by giving people
+ <emphasis>something.</emphasis>
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term>development releases</term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ Development release is much more vague term than
+ <quote>alpha</quote> or <quote>beta</quote>. I usually choose
+ to reserve the term for discussion of a development
+ branch. There are other ways to use the term. So many in
+ fact, that I feel the term has been cheapened. The popular
+ window manager <ulink
+ url="http://www.enlightenment.org">Enlightenment</ulink> has
+ released <emphasis>nothing but</emphasis> development
+ releases. Most often, the term is used to describe releases
+ that are not even to alpha or beta stages though and if I
+ were to release a pre-alpha release in order to keep interest
+ in my project live, this is probably how I would have to label
+ it.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ </variablelist>
+
+ </para>
+ </sect3>
</sect2>
<!-- Section2: announcing -->
<sect2 id="announcing">
<title>Announcing Your Project</title>
- <para></para>
- </sect2>
+ <para>
+ Well, you've done it. You've (at least for the purposes of this
+ HOWTO) designed, built, and released your free software
+ project. All that is left is for you to tell the world so they
+ know to come and try it out and hopefully jump on board with
+ development. If everything is in order as described above, this
+ will be a quick and painless process. A quick announcement is all
+ that it takes to put yourself on the free software communities
+ radar screen.
+ </para>
+
+ <sect3>
+ <title>Mailing lists and USENET</title>
+ <para>
+ Email is still the way that most people on the Internet get their
+ information. Its a good idea to send a message announcing your
+ program to any relevant mailing list you know of and any relevant
+ USENET discussion group. Karl Fogel recommends that use you
+ simple subject describing the fact that the message is an
+ announcement, the name of the program, the version, and a
+ half-line long description of its functionality. This way, any
+ interested user or developer will be immediately attracted to
+ your announcement. Fogel's example looks like:
+ </para>
+
+ <screen>Subject: ANN: aub 1.0, a program to assemble USENET binaries</screen>
+
+ <para>
+ The rest of the email should describe the programs functionality
+ quickly and concisely in no more than two paragraphs and should
+ provide links to the projects webpage and direct links to
+ downloads for those that want it right away.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ You should repeat this announcement process consistently in the
+ same locations for each subsequent release.
+ </para>
+ </sect3>
+
+ <sect3>
+ <title>freshmeat.net</title>
+ <para>
+ Mentioned earlier in <xref linkend="evalwhere">, in today's free
+ software community, announcements of your project on freshmeat
+ are almost more important than announcements on mailing list
+ announcements.
+ </para>
+ <para>
+ Visit the <ulink url="http://freshmeat.net">freshmeat
+ website</ulink> or their <ulink
+ url="http://freshmeat.net/add-project/">submit project
+ page</ulink> to post your project on their site and in their
+ database. In addition to a large website, freshmeat provides a
+ daily newsletter that highlights all the days releases and
+ reaches a huge audience (I skim it every night for any
+ interesting new releases).
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ Once you've finished this...
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ Congratulations. You've not the maintainer of an active free
+ software project. Good luck and feel free to stay in touch with
+ me about your experiences. I'd love to incorporate them into this
+ HOWTO.
+ </para>
+ </sect3>
+ </sect2>
</sect1>
</article>
projects / fspm_howto / blobdiff