From 6e8838cb11f692c0979a2d02a5af5794626ef6cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Benj. Mako Hill" <mako@atdot.cc>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:00:09 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] updated with link to article

---
 index.html | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/index.html b/index.html
index ade2399..51e0e05 100644
--- a/index.html
+++ b/index.html
@@ -84,6 +84,16 @@ hear.</a></li>
 
 </ul>
 
+<p><strong>Update:</strong> <a
+href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1111624">This
+article</a> by law professor Robert Brauneis has raised some important
+questions about the history of Happy Birthday. That said, copyright in
+the song continues to be enforced and Warner Brothers continues to
+collect more than $2 million each year in royalities. Until we hear a
+judge rule on Brauneis's suggestions, we'll continue to give Warner and
+the market the benefit of the doubt.</p>
+
+
 <h2>Is Singing <cite>Happy Birthday</cite> in Public Really Copyright
 Infringement?</h2>
 
-- 
2.30.2