X-Git-Url: https://projects.mako.cc/source/unhappybirthday/blobdiff_plain/5a1090470b0cf633ffb51e9d50939fc3b642beee..1e0ad7e453f9b61b115b6039191443ec94d3583a:/index.html diff --git a/index.html b/index.html index 91613a8..d55eb9c 100644 --- a/index.html +++ b/index.html @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ currently owned and actively enforced by Time Warner?
...or among a substantial number of people who are not family or friendsDid you know an unauthorized public performance is a form of +
Did you know an unauthorized public performance is often a form of copyright infringement?
@@ -74,8 +74,8 @@ copyright status, check out these resources:Update: This +article by law professor Robert Brauneis has raised some important +questions about the history of Happy Birthday. That said, copyright in +the song continues to be enforced and Warner Brothers continues to +collect more than $2 million each year in royalities. Until we hear a +judge rule on Brauneis's suggestions, we'll continue to give Warner and +the market the benefit of the doubt.
+ +This means that if you sing Happy Birthday to your family at -home, you're probably not committing copyright infringment. However, if you -do it in an restaurant — and if the restaurant hasn't already worked -out a deal with ASCAP — you may be engaging in copyright -infringement.
+Additionally, United States Code Title 17, §110(4) states that +singing the song among a group of people "without any direct or indirect +commercial advantage" will not constitute infringement either. But keep +in mind: "indirect commercial advantage" is very broad. Courts have +found that restaurants, camps, and other venues benefit indirectly from +performances of songs like Happy Birthday. Unless the song has been +licensed in these situations, it's infringement.
+ + +This means that if you sing Happy Birthday to your +family at home, you're probably not committing copyright infringment. +However, if you do it in an restaurant — and if the restaurant +hasn't already worked out a deal with ASCAP — you may be engaging +in copyright infringement.
If you're going send a message, here's a sample letter. (Before -sending such a letter, please be sure that the venue where you saw -Happy Birthday performed is not ASCAP-licensed, as some -restaurants, nightclubs, etc., do have blanket ASCAP catalogue licenses -that might exempt patrons from copyright liability for singing during -dinner.) You'll want to modify yours to include correct details on the +
If you're going to send a message, here's a sample letter. (Before +sending such a letter, you should know that some restaurants, +nightclubs, etc., pay for blanket ASCAP catalogue licenses that might +exempt patrons from copyright liability for singing during dinner.) +You'll want to modify yours to include correct details on the infringement:
Dear ASCAP, -The copyright status of "Happy Birthday To You" and and the law +The copyright status of "Happy Birthday To You" and the law related to public performances of copyrighted works have recently been brought to my attention. I am very concerned by the public's apparent disregard for copyright law demonstrated by rampant infringement of @@ -213,9 +231,9 @@ Birthday. href="http://www.cafepress.com/unhappybirthday">official Unhappy Birthday store. -You can get in contact with our leadership by emailing our -copyrighteous spokesman — Benjamin Mako Hill — at mako@atdot.cc
+Our president is Raymond Ty. You can get in contact with our +leadership by emailing our copyrighteous spokesman — Benjamin Mako +Hill — at mako@atdot.cc