X-Git-Url: https://projects.mako.cc/source/state_of_wikimedia_research_2015/blobdiff_plain/5fef77ce3bd734cbe19b4419b811866b14dad6d4..d872ddcaa8bbc797dde7672ca35943759c06c105:/20150717-wikimania_research.tex?ds=sidebyside

diff --git a/20150717-wikimania_research.tex b/20150717-wikimania_research.tex
index 271a3ea..2c6f528 100644
--- a/20150717-wikimania_research.tex
+++ b/20150717-wikimania_research.tex
@@ -286,8 +286,8 @@
   \item \e{2968} Wikipedia-related publications in the Scopus database
     as of November 2013
 
-  \item \e{160} recent publications reviewed or mentioned in the 12 issues
-    of the Wikimedia Research Newsletter August 2013-July 2014.
+  \item \e{191} recent publications reviewed or mentioned in the 12 issues
+    of the Wikimedia Research Newsletter from July 2014 to June 2015.
   \end{itemize}
 
 \end{frame}
@@ -446,18 +446,48 @@
 
 \end{frame}
 
-% \begin{frame}
+\begin{frame}
 
-%   \frametitle{Wikipedia Viewership and Flu Prediction: Methods}
+\frametitle{Quality of drug articles: PLoS One}
+
+  \begin{itemize}
+   \larger \larger \larger
+   \item Selected 100 drugs from German undergrad curriculum in pharmacology
+   \item Extracted information from two standard textbooks
+   \item "Accuracy of drug information in [German] Wikipedia was 99.7\%Â±0.2\% when compared to the textbook data." Similar results for English Wikipedia
+   \end{itemize}
+
+\end{frame}
+
+
+\begin{frame}
+
+\frametitle{Quality of drug articles: PLoS One}
+
+  \begin{itemize}
+   \larger \larger \larger
+   \item Completeness (as compared to the textbooks):
+   \begin{itemize} \larger \larger
+     \item 83.8\% (of 224 statements) for German WP
+     \item 87.2\% for English WP
+   \end{itemize}   
+   \item Completeness of contraindications information was 100\% in the En WP sample.
+   \item English WP cited academic publications more often than German WP.
+   \item Quality "significantly improved" in drug articles assessed 
+        in a 2010 study.
+   \end{itemize}
+
+    \note{Tilman
+    
+       The majority of the missing information (62.5\%) on German WP 
+       was judged non-relevant for undergrad students.
+    
+       The result on completeness of contraindications information is 
+       somewhat in contrast with the NEJM study. Then again, the 
+       textbooks were probably not perfectly up-to-date either.}
+\end{frame}
 
-%   \begin{itemize}
-%   \larger \larger \larger
-%   \item Measure traffic to flu related articles on Wikipedia
-%   \item Compare to the ``gold standard'' data from the Center for
-%     Disease Control (CDC)
-%   \end{itemize}
 
-% \end{frame}
 
 % \begin{frame}
 %   \frametitle{Wikipedia Viewership and Flu Prediction: Results}
