Update WRN figures for past year (160 -> 191)

[state_of_wikimedia_research_2015] / 20150717-wikimania_research.tex

diff --git a/20150717-wikimania_research.tex b/20150717-wikimania_research.tex
index 54730eedc84fa3221601b12b849a3a05d3d424f6..2c6f528dcc7c133812127e2b5d4109f71b6184e6 100644 (file)
--- a/20150717-wikimania_research.tex
+++ b/20150717-wikimania_research.tex
@@ -286,8 +286,8 @@
   \item \e{2968} Wikipedia-related publications in the Scopus database
     as of November 2013
 
-  \item \e{160} recent publications reviewed or mentioned in the 12 issues
-    of the Wikimedia Research Newsletter August 2013-July 2014.
+  \item \e{191} recent publications reviewed or mentioned in the 12 issues
+    of the Wikimedia Research Newsletter from July 2014 to June 2015.
   \end{itemize}
 
 \end{frame}
@@ -319,7 +319,64 @@
 \section{Paper Summaries}
 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
 
-\subsection{Content quality}
+\begin{frame}
+  \centertext{6em}{Wikipedia as a Source of Data}
+
+  \note{Mako}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}
+
+  \frametitle{Wikipedia as a source of data}
+
+  \larger \larger Ronen, S., Gonçalves, B., Hu, K. Z., Vespignani, A.,
+  Pinker, S., \& Hidalgo, C. A. (2014). \e{Links that speak: The
+    global language network and its association with global
+    fame}. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(52),
+  E5616—E5622. \href{http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1410931111}{doi:10.1073/pnas.1410931111}
+
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}
+  \frametitle{Wikipedia as a source of data: Ronen et al.}
+
+  \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figures/ronen_fig1.png}
+\end{frame}
+
+\subsection{Community and Organization}
+
+\begin{frame}
+  \centertext{6em}{Community and Organization}
+
+  \note{Mako}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}
+
+  \frametitle{Community and organization}
+
+  \larger \larger Warncke-Wang, M., Ranjan, V., Terveen, L., \& Hecht,
+  B. (2015). \e{Misalignment Between Supply and Demand of Quality Content
+  in Peer Production Communities}. In Ninth International AAAI
+  Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM).
+
+  % Retrieved from \href{http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM15/paper/view/10591}{http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM15/paper/view/10591}
+
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}
+  \frametitle{Community and organization: Warncke-Wang et al.}
+
+  \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figures/warncke-english_confusion.pdf}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}
+  \frametitle{Community and organization: Warncke-Wang et al.}
+
+  \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figures/warncke-english_overunder.pdf}
+\end{frame}
+
+\subsection{Content Quality}
 
 \begin{frame}
    \centertext{6em}{Content quality}
@@ -389,18 +446,48 @@
 
 \end{frame}
 
-% \begin{frame}
+\begin{frame}
 
-%   \frametitle{Wikipedia Viewership and Flu Prediction: Methods}
+\frametitle{Quality of drug articles: PLoS One}
+
+  \begin{itemize}
+   \larger \larger \larger
+   \item Selected 100 drugs from German undergrad curriculum in pharmacology
+   \item Extracted information from two standard textbooks
+   \item "Accuracy of drug information in [German] Wikipedia was 99.7\%±0.2\% when compared to the textbook data." Similar results for English Wikipedia
+   \end{itemize}
+
+\end{frame}
+
+
+\begin{frame}
+
+\frametitle{Quality of drug articles: PLoS One}
+
+  \begin{itemize}
+   \larger \larger \larger
+   \item Completeness (as compared to the textbooks):
+   \begin{itemize} \larger \larger
+     \item 83.8\% (of 224 statements) for German WP
+     \item 87.2\% for English WP
+   \end{itemize}   
+   \item Completeness of contraindications information was 100\% in the En WP sample.
+   \item English WP cited academic publications more often than German WP.
+   \item Quality "significantly improved" in drug articles assessed 
+        in a 2010 study.
+   \end{itemize}
+
+    \note{Tilman
+    
+       The majority of the missing information (62.5\%) on German WP 
+       was judged non-relevant for undergrad students.
+    
+       The result on completeness of contraindications information is 
+       somewhat in contrast with the NEJM study. Then again, the 
+       textbooks were probably not perfectly up-to-date either.}
+\end{frame}
 
-%   \begin{itemize}
-%   \larger \larger \larger
-%   \item Measure traffic to flu related articles on Wikipedia
-%   \item Compare to the ``gold standard'' data from the Center for
-%     Disease Control (CDC)
-%   \end{itemize}
 
-% \end{frame}
 
 % \begin{frame}
 %   \frametitle{Wikipedia Viewership and Flu Prediction: Results}