</author>
<revhistory>
+ <revision>
+ <revnumber>v0.3.2</revnumber>
+ <date>15 April 2002</date>
+ <authorinitials>bch</authorinitials>
+ </revision>
+
+ <revision>
+ <revnumber>v0.3.1</revnumber>
+ <date>18 June 2001</date>
+ <authorinitials>bch</authorinitials>
+ </revision>
+
<revision>
<revnumber>v0.3</revnumber>
<date>5 May 2001</date>
</para>
<para>
- This HOWTO tries to do a lot of thing (probably too many), but it
+ This HOWTO tries to do a lot of things (probably too many), but it
can't answer that question and won't attempt it. What this HOWTO
will attempt to do is give your Free Software project a fighting
chance--an edge. If you write a piece of crap that no one is
<title>Copyright Information</title>
<para>
- This document is copyrighted (c) 2000 Benjamin (Mako) Hill and is
- distributed under the terms of the Linux Documentation Project
- (LDP) license, stated below.
+ This document is copyrighted (c) 2000 Benjamin "Mako" Hill and is
+ distributed under the terms of the <citetitle>GNU Free
+ Documentation License</citetitle>.
</para>
- <para>
- Unless otherwise stated, Linux HOWTO documents are copyrighted by
- their respective authors. Linux HOWTO documents may be reproduced
- and distributed in whole or in part, in any medium physical or
- electronic, as long as this copyright notice is retained on all
- copies. Commercial redistribution is allowed and encouraged;
- however, the author would like to be notified of any such
- distributions.
- </para>
-
- <para>
- All translations, derivative works, or aggregate works
- incorporating any Linux HOWTO documents must be covered under this
- copyright notice. That is, you may not produce a derivative work
- from a HOWTO and impose additional restrictions on its
- distribution. Exceptions to these rules may be granted under
- certain conditions; please contact the Linux HOWTO coordinator at
- the address given below.
- </para>
-
- <para>
- In short, we wish to promote dissemination of this information
- through as many channels as possible. However, we do wish to
- retain copyright on the HOWTO documents, and would like to be
- notified of any plans to redistribute the HOWTOs.
- </para>
-
- <para>
- If you have any questions, please contact
- <email>linux-howto@metalab.unc.edu</email>
- </para>
+ <para>
+ Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
+ document under the terms of the <link
+ linkend="fdl"><citetitle>GNU Free Documentation
+ License</citetitle></link>, Version 1.1 or any later version
+ published by the Free Software Foundation with no Invariant
+ Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy
+ of the license can be found in <xref linkend="fdl">.
+ </para>
</sect2>
<!-- Section2: disclaimer -->
No liability for the contents of this documents can be accepted.
Use the concepts, examples and other content at your own risk. As
this is a new edition of this document, there may be errors and
- inaccuracies, that may of course be damaging to your system.
- Proceed with caution, and although this is highly unlikely, the
- author(s) do not take any responsibility for that.
+ inaccuracies, that may of course be damaging to your project (and
+ potentially your system). Proceed with caution, and although this
+ is highly unlikely, the author(s) does not take any responsibility
+ for that.
</para>
<para>
as endorsements.
</para>
- <para>
- You are strongly recommended to take a backup of your system
- before major installation and backups at regular intervals.
- </para>
</sect2>
<!-- Section2: newversions-->
<para>
This version is the part of the third pre-release cycle of this
HOWTO. It is written to be released to developers for critique and
- brainstorming and submitted to Hampshire College for academic
- credit. Please keep in mind that this version of the HOWTO is
- still in an infant stage and will be revised extensively before it
- gets publicized widely.
+ brainstorming. Please keep in mind that this version of the HOWTO
+ is still in an infant stage and will continue to be revised
+ extensively.
</para>
<para>
The latest version number of this document should always be listed
- on <ulink url="http://yukidoke.org/~mako/projects/howto">the projects
- homepage </ulink> hosted by <ulink url="http://yukidoke.org">yukidoke.org.</ulink>
+ on <ulink url="http://mako.cc/projects/howto">the projects
+ homepage </ulink> hosted by <ulink url="http://mako.cc">mako.cc.</ulink>
</para>
<para>
<listitem>
<para>
- <ulink url="http://yukidoke.org/~mako/projects/howto/FreeSoftwareProjectManagment-HOWTO/t1.html">HTML</ulink>.
+ <ulink url="http://mako.cc/projects/howto/FreeSoftwareProjectManagement-HOWTO/t1.html">HTML</ulink>.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
- <ulink url="http://yukidoke.org/~mako/projects/howto/FreeSoftwareProjectManagement-HOWTO.html">HTML (single page)</ulink>.
+ <ulink url="http://mako.cc/projects/howto/FreeSoftwareProjectManagement-HOWTO.html">HTML (single page)</ulink>.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
- <ulink URL="http://yukidoke.org/~mako/projects/howto/FreeSoftwareProjectManagement-HOWTO.txt">plain text</ulink>.
+ <ulink URL="http://mako.cc/projects/howto/FreeSoftwareProjectManagement-HOWTO.txt">plain text</ulink>.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
- <ulink url="http://yukidoke.org/~mako/projects/howto/FreeSoftwareProjectManagement-HOWTO.ps.gz">Compressed postscript</ulink>.
+ <ulink url="http://mako.cc/projects/howto/FreeSoftwareProjectManagement-HOWTO.ps.gz">Compressed postscript</ulink>.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
- <ulink url="http://yukidoke.org/~mako/projects/howto/FreeSoftwareProjectManagement-HOWTO.sgml.gz">Compressed SGML source</ulink>.
+ <ulink url="http://mako.cc/projects/howto/FreeSoftwareProjectManagement-HOWTO.sgml.gz">Compressed SGML source</ulink>.
</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
In this version I have the pleasure of acknowledging:
</para>
- <para>
- Anyone who gave me an idea for a better name and everyone who
- assured me that a Project Management HOWTO didn't necessary imply
- corporate.
- </para>
+ <para>Fellow Debian developer Martin Michlmayr and Vivek
+ Venugopalan who sent me information and links to extremely
+ interesting articles. I've added both to the bibliography and I've
+ added information from each into the HOWTO. Thanks to Andrew Shugg
+ who pointed out several errors in the document. Also, a big thanks
+ to Sung Wook Her (AKA RedBaron) who is doing the first translation
+ of the HOWTO into Korean. I've been happy to see that people have
+ enjoyed and benefited from the HOWTO so far.</para>
<para>
- Josh Crawford, Andy King, and Jaime Davila who all read through
- this beast and gave me feedback that has helped me make changes
- and improvements to this document. I can't thank you guys enough
- for your help.
+ Older thanks that I don't want to take out yet include: Josh
+ Crawford, Andy King, and Jaime Davila who all read through this in
+ entirety and gave me feedback that has helped me make changes and
+ improvements to this document. I can't thank you guys enough for
+ your help. An extra <quote>Thank You</quote> goes to Andy King who
+ who read through this several times and submitted patches to make
+ life easier for me.
</para>
<para>
- <emphasis>Karl Fogel</emphasis>, the author of <emphasis>Open
- Source Development with CVS</emphasis> published by the Coriolis
-
Open Press. Large parts of his book are available <ulink
+ Karl Fogel, the author of <citetitle>Open Source Development with
+ CVS</citetitle> published by the Coriolis Open Press. Large parts
+ of his book are available <ulink
url="http://cvsbook.red-bean.com">on the web</ulink>. 225 pages of
the book are available under the GPL and constitute the best
- tutorial on CVS I've ever seen. The rest of the book covers, "the
- challenges and philosophical issues inherent in running an Open
- Source project using CVS." The book does a good job of covering
- some of the subjects brought up in this HOWTO and much
+ tutorial on CVS I've ever seen. The rest of the book covers,
+ <quote>the challenges and philosophical issues inherent in running
+ an Open Source project using CVS.</quote> The book does a good job
+ of covering some of the subjects brought up in this HOWTO and much
more. <ulink url="http://cvsbook.red-bean.com">The book's
website</ulink> has information on ordering the book and provides
several translations of the chapters on CVS. If you are seriously
Also providing support material, and inspiration for this HOWTO is
Eric S. Raymond for his prolific, consistent, and carefully
crafted arguments and Lawrence Lessig for reminding me of the
- importance of Free Software. Additionaly, I want to thank every
+ importance of Free Software. Additionally, I want to thank every
user and developer involved with the <ulink
url="http://www.debian.org">Debian Project</ulink>. The project
has provided me with a home, a place to practice free software
advocacy, a place to make a difference, a place to learn from
- those how have been involved with the movement much longer than I,
+ those who have been involved with the movement much longer than I,
and proof of a free software project that definitely, definitely
works.
</para>
Above all, I want to thank <emphasis>Richard Stallman</emphasis>
for his work at the Free Software Foundation and for never giving
up. Stallman provides and articulates the philosophical basis that
- attracts me to free software and that drives me towards writing a
+ attracts me to free software and that drives me toward writing a
document to make sure it succeeds. RMS can always be emailed at
<email>rms (at) gnu (dot) org</email>.
</para>
</para>
<para>
- However, this HOWTO is still young and I have to yet to be
- contacted about a translation so English is all that is currently
- available. If you would like to help with or do a translation, you
- will gain my utmost respect and admiration and you'll get to be
- part of a cool process. If you are at all interested, please don't
- hesitate to contact me at: <email>mako@debian.org</email>.
+ I've been contacted by a reader who promises a translation into
+ Korean. However, this HOWTO is still young and other than the
+ promise of Korean, English is all that is currently available. If
+ you would like to help with or do a translation, you will gain my
+ utmost respect and admiration and you'll get to be part of a cool
+ process. If you are at all interested, please don't hesitate to
+ contact me at: <email>mako@debian.org</email>.
</para>
</sect2>
</sect1>
<para>
With very little argument, the beginning is the most difficult
period in a project's life to do successful free software project
- managment. Laying a firm foundation will determine whether your
+ management. Laying a firm foundation will determine whether your
project flourishes or withers away and dies. It is also the subject
that is of most immediate interest to anyone reading this document
as a tutorial.
<para>
Starting a project involves a dilemma that you as a developer must
try and deal with: no potential user for your program is interested
- in a program that doesn't work while the development process that
+ in a program that doesn't work, while the development process that
you want to employ holds involvement of users as imperative.
</para>
It is in these dangerous initial moments that anyone working to
start a free software project must try and strike a balance along
these lines. One of the most important ways that someone trying to
- start a project can work towards this balance is by establishing a
+ start a project can work toward this balance is by establishing a
solid framework for the development process through some of the
suggestions mentioned in this section.
</para>
<para>
If you are reading this document, there's a good chance you
already have an idea for a project in mind. Chances are also
- pretty good that it fills a percieved gap by doing something that
+ pretty good that it fills a perceived gap by doing something that
no other free software project does or by doing something in a way
that is unique enough to necessitate a brand new piece of
software.
In evaluating your idea, you need to first ask yourself a few
questions. This should happen before you move any further
through this HOWTO. Ask yourself: <emphasis>Is the free software
- development model really is the right one for your
+ development model really the right one for your
project?</emphasis>
</para>
</para>
<para>
- Luckily, The Internet is a place so big and so diverse that,
+ Luckily, the Internet is a place so big and so diverse that,
chances are, there is someone, somewhere, who shares your
- interests and how feels the same <quote>itch.</quote> It is the
+ interests and who feels the same <quote>itch.</quote> It is the
fact that there are so many people with so many similar needs and
desires that introduces the third major question: <emphasis>Has
somebody already had your idea or a reasonably similar
There are places you can go on the web to try and answer the
question above. If you have experience with the free software
community, you are probably already familiar with many of these
- sites. All of the resources listed bellow offer searching of
+ sites. All of the resources listed below offer searching of
their databases:
</para>
<term>Slashdot</term>
<listitem>
<para><ulink url="http://slashdot.org">Slashdot</ulink>
- provides <quote>News for Nerds: Stuff that Matters,</quote>
+ provides <quote>News for Nerds. Stuff that matters,</quote>
which usually includes discussion of free software, open
- source, technology, and geek culture new and events. It is
- not unusual for an particularly sexy development effort to be
- announced here so it definitely worth checking.</para>
+ source, technology, and geek culture news and events. It is
+ not unusual for a particularly sexy development effort to be
+ announced here, so it is definitely worth checking.</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<para><ulink url="http://sourceforge.net">SourceForge</ulink>
houses and facilitates a growing number of open source and
free software projects. It is also quickly becoming a nexus
- and an necessary stop for free software
+ and a necessary stop for free software
developers. SourceForge's <ulink
url="http://sourceforge.net/softwaremap/trove_list.php">software
map</ulink> and <ulink url="http://sourceforge.net/new/"> new
release</ulink> pages should be necessary stops before
embarking on a new free software project. SourceForge also
+ provides a <ulink
url="http://sourceforge.net/snippet/">Code Snippet
Library</ulink> which contains useful reusable chunks of code
in an array of languages which can come in useful in any
<listitem>
<para><ulink url="http://www.google.com">Google</ulink> and
<ulink url="http://www.google.com/linux"> Google's Linux
- Search</ulink>, provide powerful web searches that may reveal
+ Search</ulink>, provides powerful web searches that may reveal
people working on similar projects. It is not a catalog of
software or news like freshmeat or Slashdot, but it is worth
checking to make sure you aren't pouring your effort into a
<para>
For many developers this may be the single most difficult aspect
- of free software project managment but it is an essential one. It is
- easy to become fired up by an idea and be caught up in the
+ of free software project management, but it is an essential one. It is
+ easy to become fired up by an idea and get caught up in the
momentum and excitement of a new project. It is often extremely
- difficult to do but, it is important that any free software
- developer remember that the best interests of the free software
+ difficult to do, but it is important that any free software
+ developer remembers that the best interests of the free software
community and the quickest way to accomplish your own project's
goals and the goals of similar projects can often be
accomplished by <emphasis>not</emphasis> starting a new
project is worth giving a bit of thought. Leslie Orchard tackles
this issue in an <ulink
url="http://www.advogato.org/article/67.html">Advogato
- article</ulink>. His article is short and definately worth looking
+ article</ulink>. His article is short and definitely worth looking
over quickly.
</para>
He makes a good point though. There are companies whose only job
is to make names for pieces of software. They make
<emphasis>ridiculous</emphasis> amount of money doing it and are
- supposedly worth it. While you probably can't aford a company like
- this, you can afford to learn from their existance and think a
+ supposedly worth it. While you probably can't afford a company like
+ this, you can afford to learn from their existence and think a
little bit about the name you are giving your project because it
<emphasis>does</emphasis> matter.
</para>
criteria, you can still go ahead. I thought <quote>gnubile</quote>
was one of the best I'd heard for a free software project ever and
I still talk about it long after I've stopped using the
- program. However, if you can flexible on the subject, listen to
+ program. However, if you can be flexible on the subject, listen to
Orchard's advice. It might help you.
</para>
</sect2>
url="http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition_plain.html">Open
Source Definition.</ulink> Examples of free licenses given by the
<acronym>DFSG</acronym> are the <acronym>GPL</acronym>, the
- <acronym>BSD</acronym>, and the Artistic License.
+ <acronym>BSD</acronym>, and the Artistic License. As ESR mentions
+ in his his HOWTO<xref linkend="esrhowto">, don't write your own
+ license if at all possible. The three licenses I mention all have
+ long interpretive traditions. They are also definitely free
+ software (and can therefore be distributed as part of Debian and
+ in other places that permit the transfer of free software).
</para>
<para>
uphold, <quote>users' freedom to run, copy, distribute, study,
change and improve the software.</quote> There are plenty of
other licenses that also conform to the <acronym>DFSG</acronym>
- but sticking with a more well-known license will offer the advantage
- of immediate recognition and understanding.
+ but sticking with a more well-known license will offer the
+ advantage of immediate recognition and understanding. Many
+ people write three or four sentences in a COPYING file and assume
+ that they have written a free software license--as my long
+ experience with the debian-legal mailing professes, this is very
+ often not the case.
</para>
<para>
Software Foundation and the GNU Project, the
<acronym>GPL</acronym> is the license for the Linux kernel,
GNOME, Emacs, and the vast majority of GNU/Linux software. It's
- the obvious choice but I believe it is a good one. Any BSD
+ the obvious choice but I also believe it is a good one. Any BSD
fanatic will urge you to remember that there is a viral aspect to
the <acronym>GPL</acronym> that prevents the mixture of
<acronym>GPL</acronym>'ed code with non-<acronym>GPL</acronym>'ed
some, it is a major drawback.
</para>
+ <para>
+ Many people write three or four sentences in a COPYING file and
+ assume that they have written a free software license--as my long
+ experience with the debian-legal mailing professes, this is very
+ often not the case. It may not protect you, it may not protect
+ your software, and it may make things very difficult for people
+ that want to use your software but who pay a lot of attention to
+ the subtle legal points of licenses. If you are passionate about
+ a home-brewed license, run it by either people at <ulink
+ url="http://www.opensource.org">OSI</ulink> or the <ulink
+ url="mailto:debian-devel@lists.debian.org">debian-legal mailing
+ list</ulink> first protect yourself from unanticipated
+ side-effects of your license.
+ </para>
+
<para>
The three major licenses can be found at the following locations:
</para>
<para>
<itemizedlist>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>Make yourself or the FSF the copyright holder for the
+ work. In a few rare cases, you might want to make a sponsoring
+ organization (if it's big and powerful enough) the copyright
+ holder instead. Doing this is as simple as putting the name in
+ the blank when you modify the notice of copyright
+ below. Contrary to popular belief, you don't need to file with
+ any organization. The notice alone is enough to copyright your
+ work.</para>
+ </listitem>
+
<listitem>
<para>If at all possible, attach and distribute a full copy of
the license with the source and binary by including a separate
time. The first number is the major number and it signifies major
changes or rewrites. The second number is the minor number and it
represents added or tweaked functionality on top of a largely
- coherant structure. The third number is the patch number and it
+ coherent structure. The third number is the patch number and it
usually will only refer to releases fixing bugs.
</para>
<para>
The widespread use of this scheme is why I know the nature and
relative degree in the differences between a 2.4.12 release of the
- Linux kernel and a 2.4.11, 2.2.12, and 1.2.12 without knowning
+ Linux kernel and a 2.4.11, 2.2.12, and 1.2.12 without knowing
anything about any of the releases.
</para>
<term>Wine version numbering:</term>
<listitem>
<para>Because of the unusual nature of wine's development where
- the not-emulator is constantly improving but not working towards
+ the not-emulator is constantly improving but not working toward
any immediately achievable goal, wine is released every three
weeks. Wine does this by labeling their releases in <quote>Year
Month Day</quote> format where each release might be labeled
<ulink url="http://www.mozilla.org/roadmap.html">road
maps</ulink>. Major points and achievements along these
road-maps were marked as milestones. Therefore, although
- mozilla was built and distributed nightly as <quote>nightly
+ Mozilla was built and distributed nightly as <quote>nightly
builds,</quote> on a day when the goals of a milestone on the
road-map had been reached, that particular build was marked as
a <quote>milestone release.</quote>
In addition to man pages and command-line help, there are certain
files where people will look for documentation, especially in any
package containing source code. In a source distribution, most of
- these files can be stored in a the root directory of the source
+ these files can be stored in the root directory of the source
distribution or in a subdirectory of the root called
<quote>doc</quote> or <quote>Documentation.</quote> Common files
in these places include:
install</quote> and touches on any unusual options or actions
that may be necessary. For most relatively standard install
procedures and for most programs, INSTALL files are as short
- as possible are rarely over 100 lines.</para>
+ as possible and are rarely over 100 lines.</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
changes you make to your program. The most simple way to
maintain a CHANGELOG is to simply keep a file with the source
code for your program and add a section to the top of the
- CHANGELOG with each release describing what has been, changed,
+ CHANGELOG with each release describing what has been changed,
fixed, or added to the program. It's a good idea to post the
CHANGELOG onto the website as well because it can help people
decide whether they want or need to upgrade to a newer version
<para>A NEWS file and a ChangeLog are similar. Unlike a
CHANGELOG, a NEWS file is not typically updated with new
versions. Whenever new features are added, the developer
- responisble will make a note in the NEWS file. NEWS files
+ responsible will make a note in the NEWS file. NEWS files
should not have to be changed before a release (they should be
kept up to date all along) but it's usually a good idea to
check first anyway because often developers just forget to
<sect3>
<title>Other documentation hints</title>
- <para>
- All your documentation should be in plaintext, or, in cases where
- it is on your website primarily, in HTML. Everyone can cat a
- file, everyone has a pager, (almost) everyone can render
- HTML. <emphasis>You are welcome to distribute information in PDF,
- PostScript, RTF, or any number of other widely used formats but
- this information must also be available in plaintext or HTML or
- people will be very angry at you.</emphasis>
- </para>
+ <itemizedlist>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ All your documentation should be in plaintext, or, in cases
+ where it is on your website primarily, in HTML. Everyone can
+ cat a file, everyone has a pager, (almost) everyone can render
+ HTML. <emphasis>You are welcome to distribute information in
+ PDF, PostScript, RTF, or any number of other widely used
+ formats but this information must also be available in
+ plaintext or HTML or people will be very angry at
+ you.</emphasis> In my opinion, info falls into this category
+ as well. There is plenty of great GNU documentation that
+ people simply don't read because it only in info. And this
+ <emphasis>does</emphasis> make people angry. It's not a
+ question of superior formats; it is a question of
+ accessability and the status quo plays a huge role in this
+ determination.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ It doesn't hurt to distribute any documentation for your
+ program from your website (FAQs etc) with your program. Don't
+ hesitate to throw any of this in the program's tarball. If
+ people don't need it, they will delete it. I can repeat it over
+ and over: <emphasis>Too much documentation is not a
+ sin.</emphasis>
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <para>Unless your software is particular to a non-English
+ language (a Japanese language editor for example), please
+ distribute it with English language documentation. If you don't
+ speak English or not not confident in your skills, ask a friend
+ for help. Like it or not, fair or unfair, <emphasis>English is
+ the language of free software</emphasis>. However, this does not
+ mean you should limit your documentation to only English. If you
+ speak another language, distribute translations of documentation
+ with your software if you have the time and energy to do
+ so. They will invariably be useful to someone.</para>
+ </listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ Finally, <emphasis>please spell-check your
+ documentation.</emphasis> Misspellings in documentation are
+ bugs. I'm very guilty of committing this error and it's
+ extremely easy to do. If English is not your first language,
+ have a native speaker look over or edit your documentation or
+ web pages. Poor spelling or grammar goes a long way to making
+ your code look unprofessional. In code comments, this type of
+ thing is less important but in man pages and web pages these
+ mistakes are not acceptable.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+
+ </itemizedlist>
+
- <para>
- It doesn't hurt to distribute any documentation for your program
- from your website (FAQs etc) with your program. Don't hesitate
- throw any of this in the program's tarball. If people don't need
- it, they will delete it. I can repeat it over and over:
- <emphasis>Too much documentation is not a sin.</emphasis>
- </para>
</sect3>
</sect2>
may remind a developer of something they may have forgotten.
</para>
+ <sect3>
+ <title>Package File Names</title>
+ <para>
+ I agree with ESR when he says that: <quote> It's helpful to
+ everybody if your archive files all have GNU-like names --
+ all-lower-case alphanumeric stem prefix, followed by a dash,
+ followed by a version number, extension, and other
+ suffixes.</quote> There is more info (including lots of examples
+ of what <emphasis>not</emphasis> to do in his <citetitle>Software
+ Release Practices HOWTO</citetitle> which is included in this
+ HOWTO's bibliography and can be found through the LDP.
+ </para>
+ </sect3>
+
<sect3>
<title>Package formats</title>
<para>
Binary packages should always be distribution specific. If you
can build binary packages against a current version of a major
distribution, you will only make your users happy. Try to foster
- relationships with users or developers of large distributiosn to
+ relationships with users or developers of large distributions to
develop a system for the consistent creation of binary
packages. It's often a good idea to provide RedHat
<acronym>RPM</acronym>'s (.rpm), Debian deb's (.deb) and source
about a version control system because it provides an automated
way of solving many of the problems described by this HOWTO. I
am not aware of any free version control systems for Windows or
- MacOS but I know that CVS clients exist for both
+ Mac OS but I know that CVS clients exist for both
platforms. Websites like <ulink
url="http://sourceforge.net">SourceForge</ulink> do a great job
as well with a nice, easy-to-use web interface to CVS.
<para>
I'd love to devote more space in this HOWTO to CVS because I love
it (I even use CVS to keep versions straight on this HOWTO!) but
- I think it falls outside the scope of this document and should
- (already has) its own HOWTO.
+ I think it falls outside the scope of this document and already
+ has its own HOWTOs. Most notably is the <citetitle>CVS Best
+ Practices HOWTO</citetitle><xref linkend="cvsbestpractices">
+ which I've included in the attached bibliography.
</para>
</sect3>
<quote>yourprojectname-latest</quote> that is always pointing
to the most recent released or development version of your
free software application. Keep in mind that this location
- will recieve many requests for downloads around releases so
+ will receive many requests for downloads around releases so
make sure that the server you choose has adequate bandwidth.
</para>
</listitem>
<para>
In a bit of a disclaimer, delegation need not mean rule by
- comittee. In many cases it does and this has been proven to
+ committee. In many cases it does and this has been proven to
work. In other cases this has created problems. <ulink
url="http://news.linuxprogramming.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2000-10-31-001-05-CD">Managing
Projects the Open Source Way</ulink> argues that <quote>OSS
yourself. In a sentence: <emphasis>Keep an eye out for other
qualified developers who show an interest and sustained
involvement with your project and try and shift responsibility
- towards them.</emphasis> The following ideas might be good places
+ toward them.</emphasis> The following ideas might be good places
to start or good sources of inspiration:
</para>
<sect4>
<title>Allow a larger group of people to have write access to your CVS
- repository and make real efforts towards rule by a
+ repository and make real efforts toward rule by a
committee</title>
<para>
to you by other developers.
</para>
+ <sect3>
+ <title>Encouraging Good Patching</title>
+
+ <para>As the person managing or maintaining the project, you
+ aren't the person who is going to be making a lot of
+ patches. However, it's worth knowing about ESR's section on
+ <citetitle>Good Patching Practice</citetitle> in the
+ <citetitle>Software Release Practices HOWTO</citetitle><xref
+ linkend="esrhowto">. I don't agree with ESR's claim that most ugly
+ or undocumented patches are probably worth throwing out at first
+ sight--this just hasn't been my experience, especially when
+ dealing with bug fixes that often don't come in the form of
+ patches at all. Of course, this doesn't mean that I
+ <emphasis>like</emphasis> getting poorly done patches. If you get
+ ugly -e patches, if you get totally undocumented patches, and
+ especially if they are anything more than trivial bug-fixes, it
+ might be worth judging the patch by some of the criteria in ESR's
+ HOWTO and then throwing people the link to the document so they
+ can do it the <quote>right way.</quote>
+ </para>
+
+ </sect3>
+
<sect3>
<title>Technical judgment</title>
<listitem>
<para>The necessity to avoid digressions that might expand the
scope of the program too much and result and push the project
- towards an early death under its own weight and
+ toward an early death under its own weight and
unwieldiness.</para>
</listitem>
difficult decisions to a development mailing list where they can
be discussed and debated. There will be some patches (bug fixes,
etc.) which will definitely be accepted and some that you feel
- are so offbase that they do not even merit further
- discussion. It is those that fall into the grey area between
+ are so off base that they do not even merit further
+ discussion. It is those that fall into the gray area between
these two groups that might merit a quick forward to a mailing
list.
</para>
<sect4>
<title>Technical issues are not always good justification</title>
<para>
- Especially towards the beginning of your project's life, you
+ Especially toward the beginning of your project's life, you
will find that many changes are difficult to implement,
introduce new bugs, or have other technical problems. Try to see
past these. Especially with added functionality, good ideas do
In addition to your users being your developers, they are also
(and perhaps more commonly) your testers. Before I get flamed, I
should rephrase my sentence: <emphasis>some of your
- users</emphasis> (those who explicityly volunteer) are your
+ users</emphasis> (those who explicitly volunteer) are your
testers.
</para>
all of your users want to be testers. Many users want to use
stable software and don't care if they don't have the newest,
greatest software with the latest, greatest features. These users
- except a stable, tested piece of software without major or obvious
+ expect a stable, tested piece of software without major or obvious
bugs and will be angry if they find themselves testing. This is
yet another way in which a split development model (as mentioned
in <xref linkend="branches">) might come in handy.
</para>
<para>
- CVS comes with a bourne shell script called sanity.sh that is
+ CVS comes with a Bourne shell script called sanity.sh that is
worth looking at. Debian uses a program called lintian that
checks Debian packages for all of the most common errors. While
use of these scripts may not be helpful, there is a host of other
The second most difficult part of testing is
<emphasis>keeping</emphasis> your testers and keeping them
actively involved in the testing process. Fortunately, there are
- some tried and true tactics that can applied towards this end:
+ some tried and true tactics that can applied toward this end:
</para>
<para>
<para>
It should not come as any surprise that the key element to any
support infrastructure is good documentation. This topic was
- large covered in <xref linkend="documentation"> and will not be
+ largely covered in <xref linkend="documentation"> and will not be
repeated here.
</para>
</sect3>
- <sect3>
+ <sect3 id="mailinglists">
<title>Mailing lists</title>
<para>
Aside from documentation, effective mailing lists will be your
<para>
There are other things you want to take into consideration in
setting up your list. If it is possible to gate your mailing
- lists to USENET and provide it in digest form as well as
+ lists to Usenet and provide it in digest form as well as
making them accessible on the web, you will please some users
and work to make the support infrastructure slightly more
accessible.
url="http://bugs.debian.org">Debian Bug Tracking System</ulink>
(<acronym>BTS</acronym>) although it may not be best choice for
every project (it seems to currently be buckling under its own
- weight) As well as a damn good web browser, the mozilla project
+ weight) As well as a damn good web browser, the Mozilla project
has spawned a sub-project resulting in a bug tracking system
called <ulink
url="http://www.mozilla.org/projects/bugzilla/">bugzilla</ulink>
</para>
<sect3>
- <title>Mailing lists and USENET</title>
+ <title>Mailing lists and Usenet</title>
+
+ <para>Announce your software on Usenet's <ulink
+ url="news:comp.os.linux.announce">comp.os.linux.announce</ulink>. If
+ you only announce your software in two places, have it be c.o.l.a
+ and freshmeat.</para>
+
<para>
- Email is still the way that most people on the Internet get their
- information. Its a good idea to send a message announcing your
- program to any relevant mailing list you know of and any relevant
- USENET discussion group. Karl Fogel recommends that use you
- simple subject describing the fact that the message is an
- announcement, the name of the program, the version, and a
- half-line long description of its functionality. This way, any
- interested user or developer will be immediately attracted to
- your announcement. Fogel's example looks like:
+ However, email is still the way that most people on the Internet
+ get their information. Its a good idea to send a message
+ announcing your program to any relevant mailing list you know of
+ and any other relevant Usenet discussion groups.</para>
+
+ <para>Karl Fogel recommends that use you simple subject
+ describing the fact that the message is an announcement, the name
+ of the program, the version, and a half-line long description of
+ its functionality. This way, any interested user or developer
+ will be immediately attracted to your announcement. Fogel's
+ example looks like:
</para>
- <screen>Subject: ANN: aub 1.0, a program to assemble USENET binaries</screen>
+ <screen>Subject: ANN: aub 1.0, a program to assemble Usenet binaries</screen>
<para>
The rest of the email should describe the programs functionality
quickly and concisely in no more than two paragraphs and should
provide links to the projects webpage and direct links to
- downloads for those that want to try it right away.
+ downloads for those that want to try it right away. This form
+ will work for both Usenet and mailing list posts.
</para>
<para>
interesting new releases).
</para>
</sect3>
+
+ <sect3>
+ <title>Project Mailing List</title>
+
+ <para>If you've gone ahead and created mailing lists for your
+ project, you should always announce new versions on these
+ lists. I've found that for many projects, users request a very
+ low-volume announce only mailing list to be notified when new
+ versions are released. freshmeat.net now allows users to subscribe
+ to a particular project so they receive emails every time a new
+ version is announced through their system. It's free and it can
+ stand in for an announce-only mailing list. In my opinion, it
+ can't hurt.</para>
+ </sect3>
</sect2>
</sect1>
<abstract>
<para>
Fogel's <quote>guide to using CVS in the free software
- world</quote> is much more than its subitle. In the publisher's
+ world</quote> is much more than its subtitle. In the publisher's
own words: <quote><emphasis>Open Source Development with
CVS</emphasis> is one of the first books available that teaches
you development and implementation of Open Source
important and useful. Please check it or buy it if you can and
are seriously interested in running a free software project.
</para>
+
+ <para>In May of 2003, the entire book under the GPL. You can
+ find the full text of the book <ulink
+ url="http://cvsbook.red-bean.com/">here</ulink>.</para>
</abstract>
</biblioset>
</biblioentry>
While it only briefly talks about free software (and does it by
tiptoeing around the free software/open source issue with the
spineless use of the term <quote>open code</quote> that only a
- laywer could coin), Lessig's book is brilliant. Written by a
+ lawyer could coin), Lessig's book is brilliant. Written by a
lawyer, it talks about how regulation on the Internet is not
done with law, but with the code itself and how the nature of
the code will determine the nature of future freedoms. In
</bibliodiv>
<bibliodiv>
- <title>Web-Accessable Resources</title>
+ <title>Web-Accessible Resources</title>
<para>
This is a list of the web resources pertaining to this HOWTO that
<para>
I'd recommend that any free software developer (or potential one)
- skim through these sites becaue they have each have a lot to say.
+ skim through these sites because they have each have a lot to say.
</para>
+
+ <biblioentry>
+ <biblioset>
+ <author>
+ <surname>Dafermos</surname>
+ <firstname>George</firstname>
+ <othername>N</othername>
+ </author>
+
+ <title><ulink url="http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue6_11/dafermos/">Management and Virtual Decentralized Networks: The Linux Project</ulink></title>
+
+ <abstract>
+ <para>Since the paper includes its own abstract, I thought I
+ would include it here verbatim:</para>
+
+ <para><blockquote><para>This paper examines the latest of
+ paradigms - the Virtual Network(ed) Organisation - and whether
+ geographically dispersed knowledge workers can virtually
+ collaborate for a project under no central
+ planning. Co-ordination, management and the role of knowledge
+ arise as the central areas of focus. The Linux Project and its
+ development model are selected as a case of analysis and the
+ critical success factors of this organisational design are
+ identified. The study proceeds to the formulation of a
+ framework that can be applied to all kinds of virtual
+ decentralised work and concludes that value creation is
+ maximized when there is intense interaction and uninhibited
+ sharing of information between the organisation and the
+ surrounding community. Therefore, the potential success or
+ failure of this organisational paradigm depends on the degree
+ of dedication and involvement by the surrounding
+ community.</para></blockquote></para>
+
+ <para>This paper was referred to me in my capacity as author of
+ this HOWTO and I was very impressed. It's written by a graduate
+ student in management and I think it succeeds at evaluating the
+ Linux project as an example of a new paradigm in management--one
+ that <emphasis>you</emphasis> will be be placing yourself at the
+ center of in your capacity as maintainer of a free software
+ project.</para>
+
+ <para>As a developer trying to control an application and guide
+ it to success in the free software world, I'm not sure how
+ useful Dafermos's argument is. It does however, provide a
+ theoretical justification for my HOWTO--free software project
+ management <emphasis>is</emphasis> a different creature than
+ proprietary software project management. If you are interested
+ in the conceptual and theoretical ways that free software
+ project management differs from other types of management, this
+ is a great paper to read. If this paper answers questions of
+ <quote>how?</quote>, Dafermos answers the (more difficult to
+ defend) questions of <quote>why?</quote> and does a very good
+ job.</para>
+
+
+ </abstract>
+ </biblioset>
+ </biblioentry>
+
+ <biblioentry>
+ <biblioset>
+ <author>
+ <surname>Gabriel</surname>
+ <firstname>Richard</firstname>
+ </author>
+
+ <title><ulink
+ url="http://www.jwz.org/doc/worse-is-better.html">The Rise of
+ <quote>Worse is Better</quote></ulink></title>
+
+ <abstract>
+ <para>
+ A well written article although I think the title may have
+ confused as many people as the rest of the essay helped. It
+ offers a good description of how to design programs that will
+ succeed and stay maintainable as they grow.
+ </para>
+ </abstract>
+ </biblioset>
+ </biblioentry>
+
<biblioentry>
<biblioset>
<author>
<para>
In one of the better articles on the subject that I've read,
Monty sums up some of the major points I touch on including:
- starting a project, testing, documenation, organizing a team and
- leadership, and several other topics. While more opiniated that
+ starting a project, testing, documentation, organizing a team and
+ leadership, and several other topics. While more opinionated that
I try to be, I think its an important article that I found very
helpful in writing this HOWTO. I've tried to cite him in
the places where I borrowed from him most.
</biblioset>
</biblioentry>
- <biblioentry>
+ <biblioentry id="esrhowto">
<biblioset>
<author>
- <surname>Gabriel</surname>
- <firstname>Richard</firstname>
+ <surname>Raymond</surname>
+ <firstname>Eric</firstname>
+ <othername>Steven</othername>
</author>
-
- <title><ulink
- url="http://www.jwz.org/doc/worse-is-better.html">The Rise of
- <quote>Worse is Better</quote></ulink></title>
+
+ <title><ulink url="http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Software-Release-Practice-HOWTO/index.html">Software Release Practice HOWTO</ulink></title>
<abstract>
- <para>
- A well written article although I think the title may have
- confused as many people as the rest of the essay helped. It
- offers a good description of how to design programs that will
- succeed and stay maintainable as they grow.
- </para>
+
+ <para>At first glance, ESR's release practice HOWTO seems to
+ share a lot of terrain with this document. Upon closer
+ examination, the differences become apparent but they are
+ closely related. His document, read in conjunction with mine,
+ will give a reader a good picture of how to go about managing a
+ project. ESR's HOWTO goes into a bit more detail on how to write
+ and what languages to write in. He tends to give more specific
+ instructions and checklists (<quote>name this file this, not
+ this</quote>) while this HOWTO speaks more conceptually. There
+ are several sections that are extremely similar. It's also
+ <emphasis>much</emphasis> shorter.</para>
+
+ <para>My favorite quote from his HOWTO is: <quote>"Managing a
+ project well when all the participants are volunteers presents
+ some unique challenges. This is too large a topic to cover in a
+ HOWTO.</quote> Oh really? Perhaps I just do a poor job.</para>
+ </abstract>
+
+ </biblioset>
+ </biblioentry>
+
+
+ <biblioentry id="cvsbestpractices">
+ <biblioset>
+ <author>
+ <surname>Venugopalan</surname>
+ <firstname>Vivek</firstname>
+ </author>
+
+ <title><ulink url="http://www.magic-cauldron.com/cm/cvs-bestpractices/index.html">CVS Best Practices</ulink></title>
+
+ <abstract>
+
+ <para>Venugopalan provides one of the best essays on
+ effective use of CVS that I've come across. It is written for
+ people who already have a good knowledge of CVS. In the chapter
+ on branching, he describes when and how to branch but gives no
+ information on what CVS commands you should use to do this. This
+ is fine (technical CVS HOWTO have been written) but CVS newbies
+ will want to spend some time with Fogel's reference before they
+ will find this one very useful.</para>
+
+ <para>Venugopalan creates checklists of things to do before,
+ after, and around releases. It's definitely worth a read through
+ as most of his ideas will save tons of developer head aches over
+ any longer period of time.</para>
+
</abstract>
</biblioset>
</biblioentry>
+
</bibliodiv>
<bibliodiv>
</para>
<para>
- I have spent a huge amount of time on advogato and I've gone
+ I have spent a huge amount of time on Advogato and I've gone
through and provided links to the articles that I think might be
of particular interest to anyone reading this HOWTO. I think that
- skimming through these links can be helfpul and I promise that if
+ skimming through these links can be helpful and I promise that if
you do, you'll learn a lot. You will learn that my idea of how a
free software project should be run is not the
<emphasis>only</emphasis> idea. I think that's important.
If nothing else, there is <emphasis>way</emphasis> more
information on that website than I could ever fit into, or
reference from this HOWTO. I have listed what I think are the most
- relavant articles here with short descriptions that I've written.
+ relevant articles here with short descriptions that I've written.
</para>
<para>
Touching mostly on programming practice (as most articles on
the subject usually do), the article talks a little about
- project managment (<quote>Use it!</quote>) and a bit about
+ project management (<quote>Use it!</quote>) and a bit about
communication within a free software project.
</para>
</abstract>
<abstract>
<para>
While the article is little more than a question, reading the
- answers to this question offered by advogato's readers can
+ answers to this question offered by Advogato's readers can
help. In a lot of ways, this HOWTO acts as my answer to the
questions posed in this article but there are others, many of
which might take issue with whats is in this HOWTO. It's worth
<abstract>
<para>
This document was written as a response to <ulink
- url="http://www.advogato.org/article/72.html">another advogato
+ url="http://www.advogato.org/article/72.html">another Advogato
article</ulink>. Although not about running a project, this
describes some of the ways that you can get started with free
software development without starting a project. I think this
<surname>Moorman</surname>
<firstname>Jacob</firstname>
</author>
-
- <title><ulink
- url="http://www.advogato.org/article/72.html"></ulink>Importance
- of Non-Developer Supporters in Free Software</title>
-
+
+ <title><ulink url="http://www.advogato.org/article/72.html">Importance of
+ Non-Developer Supporters in Free Software</ulink><title></title>
+
<publisher>
<publishername><ulink url="http://www.advogato.org">Advogato</ulink></publishername>
</publisher>
<publisher>
<publishername><ulink url="http://www.advogato.org">Advogato</ulink></publishername>
</publisher>
- <pubdate>Februrary 28, 2000</pubdate>
+ <pubdate>February 28, 2000</pubdate>
<abstract>
<para>
- In this article, David Allen challengs the whole
+ In this article, David Allen challenges the whole
<quote>Major.Minor.Patch</quote> version numbering scheme. Its
good to read this as you read <xref
linkend="chooseversioning">. I liked the article and it
describes some of the projects that I bring up in my discussion
- of verion numbering.
+ of version numbering.
</para>
</abstract>
</biblioset>
</bibliodiv>
</bibliography>
+<!--
+ The GNU Free Documentation License 1.1 in DocBook
+ Markup by Eric Baudais <baudais@okstate.edu>
+ Maintained by the GNOME Documentation Project
+ http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gdp
+ Version: 1.0.1
+ Last Modified: Nov 16, 2000
+-->
+
+<appendix id="fdl">
+ <docinfo>
+ <releaseinfo>
+ Version 1.1, March 2000
+ </releaseinfo>
+ <copyright>
+ <year>2000</year><holder>Free Software Foundation, Inc.</holder>
+ </copyright>
+ <legalnotice id="fdl-legalnotice">
+ <para>
+ <address>Free Software Foundation, Inc. <street>59 Temple Place,
+ Suite 330</street>, <city>Boston</city>, <state>MA</state>
+ <postcode>02111-1307</postcode> <country>USA</country></address>
+ Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this
+ license document, but changing it is not allowed.
+ </para>
+ </legalnotice>
+ </docinfo>
+ <title>GNU Free Documentation License</title>
+
+ <simplesect id="fdl-preamble">
+ <title>0. PREAMBLE</title>
+ <para>
+ The purpose of this License is to make a manual, textbook, or
+ other written document <quote>free</quote> in the sense of
+ freedom: to assure everyone the effective freedom to copy and
+ redistribute it, with or without modifying it, either
+ commercially or non-commercially. Secondarily, this License
+ preserves for the author and publisher a way to get credit for
+ their work, while not being considered responsible for
+ modifications made by others.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ This License is a kind of <quote>copyleft</quote>, which means
+ that derivative works of the document must themselves be free in
+ the same sense. It complements the GNU General Public License,
+ which is a copyleft license designed for free software.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ We have designed this License in order to use it for manuals for
+ free software, because free software needs free documentation: a
+ free program should come with manuals providing the same
+ freedoms that the software does. But this License is not limited
+ to software manuals; it can be used for any textual work,
+ regardless of subject matter or whether it is published as a
+ printed book. We recommend this License principally for works
+ whose purpose is instruction or reference.
+ </para>
+ </simplesect>
+ <simplesect id="fdl-simplesect1">
+ <title>1. APPLICABILITY AND DEFINITIONS</title>
+ <para id="fdl-document">
+ This License applies to any manual or other work that contains a
+ notice placed by the copyright holder saying it can be
+ distributed under the terms of this License. The
+ <quote>Document</quote>, below, refers to any such manual or
+ work. Any member of the public is a licensee, and is addressed
+ as <quote>you</quote>.
+ </para>
+
+ <para id="fdl-modified">
+ A <quote>Modified Version</quote> of the Document means any work
+ containing the Document or a portion of it, either copied
+ verbatim, or with modifications and/or translated into another
+ language.
+ </para>
+
+ <para id="fdl-secondary">
+ A <quote>Secondary Section</quote> is a named appendix or a
+ front-matter section of the <link
+ linkend="fdl-document">Document</link> that deals exclusively
+ with the relationship of the publishers or authors of the
+ Document to the Document's overall subject (or to related
+ matters) and contains nothing that could fall directly within
+ that overall subject. (For example, if the Document is in part a
+ textbook of mathematics, a Secondary Section may not explain any
+ mathematics.) The relationship could be a matter of historical
+ connection with the subject or with related matters, or of
+ legal, commercial, philosophical, ethical or political position
+ regarding them.
+ </para>
+
+ <para id="fdl-invariant">
+ The <quote>Invariant Sections</quote> are certain <link
+ linkend="fdl-secondary"> Secondary Sections</link> whose titles
+ are designated, as being those of Invariant Sections, in the
+ notice that says that the <link
+ linkend="fdl-document">Document</link> is released under this
+ License.
+ </para>
+
+ <para id="fdl-cover-texts">
+ The <quote>Cover Texts</quote> are certain short passages of
+ text that are listed, as Front-Cover Texts or Back-Cover Texts,
+ in the notice that says that the <link
+ linkend="fdl-document">Document</link> is released under this
+ License.
+ </para>
+
+ <para id="fdl-transparent">
+ A <quote>Transparent</quote> copy of the <link
+ linkend="fdl-document"> Document</link> means a machine-readable
+ copy, represented in a format whose specification is available
+ to the general public, whose contents can be viewed and edited
+ directly and straightforwardly with generic text editors or (for
+ images composed of pixels) generic paint programs or (for
+ drawings) some widely available drawing editor, and that is
+ suitable for input to text formatters or for automatic
+ translation to a variety of formats suitable for input to text
+ formatters. A copy made in an otherwise Transparent file format
+ whose markup has been designed to thwart or discourage
+ subsequent modification by readers is not Transparent. A copy
+ that is not <quote>Transparent</quote> is called
+ <quote>Opaque</quote>.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ Examples of suitable formats for Transparent copies include
+ plain ASCII without markup, Texinfo input format, LaTeX input
+ format, SGML or XML using a publicly available DTD, and
+ standard-conforming simple HTML designed for human
+ modification. Opaque formats include PostScript, PDF,
+ proprietary formats that can be read and edited only by
+ proprietary word processors, SGML or XML for which the DTD
+ and/or processing tools are not generally available, and the
+ machine-generated HTML produced by some word processors for
+ output purposes only.
+ </para>
+
+ <para id="fdl-title-page">
+ The <quote>Title Page</quote> means, for a printed book, the
+ title page itself, plus such following pages as are needed to
+ hold, legibly, the material this License requires to appear in
+ the title page. For works in formats which do not have any title
+ page as such, <quote>Title Page</quote> means the text near the
+ most prominent appearance of the work's title, preceding the
+ beginning of the body of the text.
+ </para>
+ </simplesect>
+
+ <simplesect id="fdl-section2">
+ <title>2. VERBATIM COPYING</title>
+ <para>
+ You may copy and distribute the <link
+ linkend="fdl-document">Document</link> in any medium, either
+ commercially or non-commercially, provided that this License, the
+ copyright notices, and the license notice saying this License
+ applies to the Document are reproduced in all copies, and that
+ you add no other conditions whatsoever to those of this
+ License. You may not use technical measures to obstruct or
+ control the reading or further copying of the copies you make or
+ distribute. However, you may accept compensation in exchange for
+ copies. If you distribute a large enough number of copies you
+ must also follow the conditions in <link
+ linkend="fdl-section3">section 3</link>.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ You may also lend copies, under the same conditions stated
+ above, and you may publicly display copies.
+ </para>
+ </simplesect>
+
+ <simplesect id="fdl-section3">
+ <title>3. COPYING IN QUANTITY</title>
+ <para>
+ If you publish printed copies of the <link
+ linkend="fdl-document">Document</link> numbering more than 100,
+ and the Document's license notice requires <link
+ linkend="fdl-cover-texts">Cover Texts</link>, you must enclose
+ the copies in covers that carry, clearly and legibly, all these
+ Cover Texts: Front-Cover Texts on the front cover, and
+ Back-Cover Texts on the back cover. Both covers must also
+ clearly and legibly identify you as the publisher of these
+ copies. The front cover must present the full title with all
+ words of the title equally prominent and visible. You may add
+ other material on the covers in addition. Copying with changes
+ limited to the covers, as long as they preserve the title of the
+ <link linkend="fdl-document">Document</link> and satisfy these
+ conditions, can be treated as verbatim copying in other
+ respects.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ If the required texts for either cover are too voluminous to fit
+ legibly, you should put the first ones listed (as many as fit
+ reasonably) on the actual cover, and continue the rest onto
+ adjacent pages.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ If you publish or distribute <link
+ linkend="fdl-transparent">Opaque</link> copies of the <link
+ linkend="fdl-document">Document</link> numbering more than 100,
+ you must either include a machine-readable <link
+ linkend="fdl-transparent">Transparent</link> copy along with
+ each Opaque copy, or state in or with each Opaque copy a
+ publicly-accessible computer-network location containing a
+ complete Transparent copy of the Document, free of added
+ material, which the general network-using public has access to
+ download anonymously at no charge using public-standard network
+ protocols. If you use the latter option, you must take
+ reasonably prudent steps, when you begin distribution of Opaque
+ copies in quantity, to ensure that this Transparent copy will
+ remain thus accessible at the stated location until at least one
+ year after the last time you distribute an Opaque copy (directly
+ or through your agents or retailers) of that edition to the
+ public.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ It is requested, but not required, that you contact the authors
+ of the <link linkend="fdl-document">Document</link> well before
+ redistributing any large number of copies, to give them a chance
+ to provide you with an updated version of the Document.
+ </para>
+ </simplesect>
+
+ <simplesect id="fdl-section4">
+ <title>4. MODIFICATIONS</title>
+ <para>
+ You may copy and distribute a <link
+ linkend="fdl-modified">Modified Version</link> of the <link
+ linkend="fdl-document">Document</link> under the conditions of
+ sections <link linkend="fdl-section2">2</link> and <link
+ linkend="fdl-section3">3</link> above, provided that you release
+ the Modified Version under precisely this License, with the
+ Modified Version filling the role of the Document, thus
+ licensing distribution and modification of the Modified Version
+ to whoever possesses a copy of it. In addition, you must do
+ these things in the Modified Version:
+ </para>
+
+ <itemizedlist mark="opencircle">
+ <listitem>
+ <formalpara>
+ <title>A</title>
+ <para>
+ Use in the <link linkend="fdl-title-page">Title
+ Page</link> (and on the covers, if any) a title distinct
+ from that of the <link
+ linkend="fdl-document">Document</link>, and from those of
+ previous versions (which should, if there were any, be
+ listed in the History section of the Document). You may
+ use the same title as a previous version if the original
+ publisher of that version gives permission.
+ </para>
+ </formalpara>
+ </listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <formalpara>
+ <title>B</title>
+ <para>
+ List on the <link linkend="fdl-title-page">Title
+ Page</link>, as authors, one or more persons or entities
+ responsible for authorship of the modifications in the
+ <link linkend="fdl-modified">Modified Version</link>,
+ together with at least five of the principal authors of
+ the <link linkend="fdl-document">Document</link> (all of
+ its principal authors, if it has less than five).
+ </para>
+ </formalpara>
+ </listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <formalpara>
+ <title>C</title>
+ <para>
+ State on the <link linkend="fdl-title-page">Title
+ Page</link> the name of the publisher of the <link
+ linkend="fdl-modified">Modified Version</link>, as the
+ publisher.
+ </para>
+ </formalpara>
+ </listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <formalpara>
+ <title>D</title>
+ <para>
+ Preserve all the copyright notices of the <link
+ linkend="fdl-document">Document</link>.
+ </para>
+ </formalpara>
+ </listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <formalpara>
+ <title>E</title>
+ <para>
+ Add an appropriate copyright notice for your modifications
+ adjacent to the other copyright notices.
+ </para>
+ </formalpara>
+ </listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <formalpara>
+ <title>F</title>
+ <para>
+ Include, immediately after the copyright notices, a
+ license notice giving the public permission to use the
+ <link linkend="fdl-modified">Modified Version</link> under
+ the terms of this License, in the form shown in the
+ Addendum below.
+ </para>
+ </formalpara>
+ </listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <formalpara>
+ <title>G</title>
+ <para>
+ Preserve in that license notice the full lists of <link
+ linkend="fdl-invariant"> Invariant Sections</link> and
+ required <link linkend="fdl-cover-texts">Cover
+ Texts</link> given in the <link
+ linkend="fdl-document">Document's</link> license notice.
+ </para>
+ </formalpara>
+ </listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <formalpara>
+ <title>H</title>
+ <para>
+ Include an unaltered copy of this License.
+ </para>
+ </formalpara>
+ </listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <formalpara>
+ <title>I</title>
+ <para>
+ Preserve the section entitled <quote>History</quote>, and
+ its title, and add to it an item stating at least the
+ title, year, new authors, and publisher of the <link
+ linkend="fdl-modified">Modified Version </link>as given on
+ the <link linkend="fdl-title-page">Title Page</link>. If
+ there is no section entitled <quote>History</quote> in the
+ <link linkend="fdl-document">Document</link>, create one
+ stating the title, year, authors, and publisher of the
+ Document as given on its Title Page, then add an item
+ describing the Modified Version as stated in the previous
+ sentence.
+ </para>
+ </formalpara>
+ </listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <formalpara>
+ <title>J</title>
+ <para>
+ Preserve the network location, if any, given in the <link
+ linkend="fdl-document">Document</link> for public access
+ to a <link linkend="fdl-transparent">Transparent</link>
+ copy of the Document, and likewise the network locations
+ given in the Document for previous versions it was based
+ on. These may be placed in the <quote>History</quote>
+ section. You may omit a network location for a work that
+ was published at least four years before the Document
+ itself, or if the original publisher of the version it
+ refers to gives permission.
+ </para>
+ </formalpara>
+ </listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <formalpara>
+ <title>K</title>
+ <para>
+ In any section entitled <quote>Acknowledgements</quote> or
+ <quote>Dedications</quote>, preserve the section's title,
+ and preserve in the section all the substance and tone of
+ each of the contributor acknowledgements and/or
+ dedications given therein.
+ </para>
+ </formalpara>
+ </listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <formalpara>
+ <title>L</title>
+ <para>
+ Preserve all the <link linkend="fdl-invariant">Invariant
+ Sections</link> of the <link
+ linkend="fdl-document">Document</link>, unaltered in their
+ text and in their titles. Section numbers or the
+ equivalent are not considered part of the section titles.
+ </para>
+ </formalpara>
+ </listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <formalpara>
+ <title>M</title>
+ <para>
+ Delete any section entitled
+ <quote>Endorsements</quote>. Such a section may not be
+ included in the <link linkend="fdl-modified">Modified
+ Version</link>.
+ </para>
+ </formalpara>
+ </listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <formalpara>
+ <title>N</title>
+ <para>
+ Do not retitle any existing section as
+ <quote>Endorsements</quote> or to conflict in title with
+ any <link linkend="fdl-invariant">Invariant
+ Section</link>.
+ </para>
+ </formalpara>
+ </listitem>
+ </itemizedlist>
+
+ <para>
+ If the <link linkend="fdl-modified">Modified Version</link>
+ includes new front-matter sections or appendices that qualify as
+ <link linkend="fdl-secondary">Secondary Sections</link> and
+ contain no material copied from the Document, you may at your
+ option designate some or all of these sections as invariant. To
+ do this, add their titles to the list of <link
+ linkend="fdl-invariant">Invariant Sections</link> in the
+ Modified Version's license notice. These titles must be
+ distinct from any other section titles.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ You may add a section entitled <quote>Endorsements</quote>,
+ provided it contains nothing but endorsements of your <link
+ linkend="fdl-modified">Modified Version</link> by various
+ parties--for example, statements of peer review or that the text
+ has been approved by an organization as the authoritative
+ definition of a standard.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ You may add a passage of up to five words as a <link
+ linkend="fdl-cover-texts">Front-Cover Text</link>, and a passage
+ of up to 25 words as a <link
+ linkend="fdl-cover-texts">Back-Cover Text</link>, to the end of
+ the list of <link linkend="fdl-cover-texts">Cover Texts</link>
+ in the <link linkend="fdl-modified">Modified Version</link>.
+ Only one passage of Front-Cover Text and one of Back-Cover Text
+ may be added by (or through arrangements made by) any one
+ entity. If the <link linkend="fdl-document">Document</link>
+ already includes a cover text for the same cover, previously
+ added by you or by arrangement made by the same entity you are
+ acting on behalf of, you may not add another; but you may
+ replace the old one, on explicit permission from the previous
+ publisher that added the old one.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ The author(s) and publisher(s) of the <link
+ linkend="fdl-document">Document</link> do not by this License
+ give permission to use their names for publicity for or to
+ assert or imply endorsement of any <link
+ linkend="fdl-modified">Modified Version </link>.
+ </para>
+ </simplesect>
+
+ <simplesect id="fdl-section5">
+ <title>5. COMBINING DOCUMENTS</title>
+ <para>
+ You may combine the <link linkend="fdl-document">Document</link>
+ with other documents released under this License, under the
+ terms defined in <link linkend="fdl-section4">section 4</link>
+ above for modified versions, provided that you include in the
+ combination all of the <link linkend="fdl-invariant">Invariant
+ Sections</link> of all of the original documents, unmodified,
+ and list them all as Invariant Sections of your combined work in
+ its license notice.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ The combined work need only contain one copy of this License,
+ and multiple identical <link linkend="fdl-invariant">Invariant
+ Sections</link> may be replaced with a single copy. If there are
+ multiple Invariant Sections with the same name but different
+ contents, make the title of each such section unique by adding
+ at the end of it, in parentheses, the name of the original
+ author or publisher of that section if known, or else a unique
+ number. Make the same adjustment to the section titles in the
+ list of Invariant Sections in the license notice of the combined
+ work.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ In the combination, you must combine any sections entitled
+ <quote>History</quote> in the various original documents,
+ forming one section entitled <quote>History</quote>; likewise
+ combine any sections entitled <quote>Acknowledgements</quote>,
+ and any sections entitled <quote>Dedications</quote>. You must
+ delete all sections entitled <quote>Endorsements.</quote>
+ </para>
+ </simplesect>
+
+ <simplesect id="fdl-section6">
+ <title>6. COLLECTIONS OF DOCUMENTS</title>
+ <para>
+ You may make a collection consisting of the <link
+ linkend="fdl-document">Document</link> and other documents
+ released under this License, and replace the individual copies
+ of this License in the various documents with a single copy that
+ is included in the collection, provided that you follow the
+ rules of this License for verbatim copying of each of the
+ documents in all other respects.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ You may extract a single document from such a collection, and
+ dispbibute it individually under this License, provided you
+ insert a copy of this License into the extracted document, and
+ follow this License in all other respects regarding verbatim
+ copying of that document.
+ </para>
+ </simplesect>
+
+ <simplesect id="fdl-section7">
+ <title>7. AGGREGATION WITH INDEPENDENT WORKS</title>
+ <para>
+ A compilation of the <link
+ linkend="fdl-document">Document</link> or its derivatives with
+ other separate and independent documents or works, in or on a
+ volume of a storage or distribution medium, does not as a whole
+ count as a <link linkend="fdl-modified">Modified Version</link>
+ of the Document, provided no compilation copyright is claimed
+ for the compilation. Such a compilation is called an
+ <quote>aggregate</quote>, and this License does not apply to the
+ other self-contained works thus compiled with the Document , on
+ account of their being thus compiled, if they are not themselves
+ derivative works of the Document. If the <link
+ linkend="fdl-cover-texts">Cover Text</link> requirement of <link
+ linkend="fdl-section3">section 3</link> is applicable to these
+ copies of the Document, then if the Document is less than one
+ quarter of the entire aggregate, the Document's Cover Texts may
+ be placed on covers that surround only the Document within the
+ aggregate. Otherwise they must appear on covers around the whole
+ aggregate.
+ </para>
+ </simplesect>
+
+ <simplesect id="fdl-section8">
+ <title>8. TRANSLATION</title>
+ <para>
+ Translation is considered a kind of modification, so you may
+ distribute translations of the <link
+ linkend="fdl-document">Document</link> under the terms of <link
+ linkend="fdl-section4">section 4</link>. Replacing <link
+ linkend="fdl-invariant"> Invariant Sections</link> with
+ translations requires special permission from their copyright
+ holders, but you may include translations of some or all
+ Invariant Sections in addition to the original versions of these
+ Invariant Sections. You may include a translation of this
+ License provided that you also include the original English
+ version of this License. In case of a disagreement between the
+ translation and the original English version of this License,
+ the original English version will prevail.
+ </para>
+ </simplesect>
+
+ <simplesect id="fdl-section9">
+ <title>9. TERMINATION</title>
+ <para>
+ You may not copy, modify, sublicense, or distribute the <link
+ linkend="fdl-document">Document</link> except as expressly
+ provided for under this License. Any other attempt to copy,
+ modify, sublicense or distribute the Document is void, and will
+ automatically terminate your rights under this License. However,
+ parties who have received copies, or rights, from you under this
+ License will not have their licenses terminated so long as such
+ parties remain in full compliance.
+ </para>
+ </simplesect>
+
+ <simplesect id="fdl-section10">
+ <title>10. FUTURE REVISIONS OF THIS LICENSE</title>
+ <para>
+ The <ulink type="http"
+ url="http://www.gnu.org/fsf/fsf.html">Free Software
+ Foundation</ulink> may publish new, revised versions of the GNU
+ Free Documentation License from time to time. Such new versions
+ will be similar in spirit to the present version, but may differ
+ in detail to address new problems or concerns. See <ulink
+ type="http"
+ url="http://www.gnu.org/copyleft">http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/</ulink>.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ Each version of the License is given a distinguishing version
+ number. If the <link linkend="fdl-document">Document</link>
+ specifies that a particular numbered version of this License
+ <quote>or any later version</quote> applies to it, you have the
+ option of following the terms and conditions either of that
+ specified version or of any later version that has been
+ published (not as a draft) by the Free Software Foundation. If
+ the Document does not specify a version number of this License,
+ you may choose any version ever published (not as a draft) by
+ the Free Software Foundation.
+ </para>
+ </simplesect>
+</appendix>
+
</article>
<!-- Keep this comment at the end of the file
sgml-local-catalogs:nil
sgml-local-ecat-files:nil
End:
--->
\ No newline at end of file
+-->
projects / fspm_howto / blobdiff